
Pentium Gold 8505

Xeon E5-2620 v4
Pentium Gold 8505 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Pentium Gold 8505 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Pentium Gold 8505 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Pentium Gold 8505
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 85W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FCBGA1744 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2011 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics, while Xeon E5-2620 v4 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E5-2620 v4 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (9,167 vs 9,255).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 20 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-2620 v4, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 40 PCIe lanes.
Xeon E5-2620 v4
2016Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+150% larger total L3 cache (20 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 40 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅100% more PCIe lanes (40 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $417 MSRP, while Pentium Gold 8505 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌54.5% higher power demand at 85W vs 55W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2011 with DDR4, while Pentium Gold 8505 moves to FCBGA1744 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Pentium Gold 8505 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5-2620 v4 better than Pentium Gold 8505?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Pentium Gold 8505 vs Xeon E5-2620 v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Pentium Gold 8505
The Pentium Gold 8505 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It features 5 cores and 6 threads. Max frequency: 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache. Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1744. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800, DDR4-3200, LPDDR5-5200, LPDDR4x-4267. Passmark benchmark score: 9,167 points. Launch price was $69.

Xeon E5-2620 v4
The Xeon E5-2620 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 20 MB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 9,255 points. Launch price was $417.
Processing Power
The Pentium Gold 8505 packs 5 cores / 6 threads, while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E5-2620 v4 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Pentium Gold 8505 versus 3 GHz on the Xeon E5-2620 v4 — a 37.8% clock advantage for the Pentium Gold 8505. The Xeon E5-2620 v4 is built on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. In PassMark, the Pentium Gold 8505 scores 9,167 against the Xeon E5-2620 v4's 9,255 — a 1% lead for the Xeon E5-2620 v4. L3 cache: 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache on the Pentium Gold 8505 vs 20 MB on the Xeon E5-2620 v4.
| Feature | Pentium Gold 8505 | Xeon E5-2620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 5 / 6 | 8 / 16+60% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+47% | 3 GHz |
| Base Clock | — | 2.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 8 MB Intel® Smart Cache | 20 MB+150% |
| L2 Cache | — | 2 MB |
| Process | Intel 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | — | Broadwell (2015−2019) |
| PassMark | 9,167 | 9,255 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,550 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 4,055 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium Gold 8505 uses the FCBGA1744 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-4800 on the Pentium Gold 8505 versus DDR4-2133 on the Xeon E5-2620 v4 — the Pentium Gold 8505 supports 125% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon E5-2620 v4 supports up to 1536 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 2300% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Pentium Gold 8505) vs 4 (Xeon E5-2620 v4). PCIe lanes: 20 (Pentium Gold 8505) vs 40 (Xeon E5-2620 v4) — the Xeon E5-2620 v4 offers 20 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Pentium Gold 8505) and Intel X99,Intel C612 (Xeon E5-2620 v4).
| Feature | Pentium Gold 8505 | Xeon E5-2620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FCBGA1744 | LGA2011 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-4800+125% | DDR4-2133 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 1536 GB+2300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 40+100% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: Yes (Pentium Gold 8505) / not specified (Xeon E5-2620 v4). The Pentium Gold 8505 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics), while the Xeon E5-2620 v4 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Pentium Gold 8505 | Xeon E5-2620 v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | UHD Graphics | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | Yes | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













