Pentium M 765 vs Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Pentium M 765
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 765 is positioned at rank 918 and the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is on rank 1077, so the Pentium M 765 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 765
Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pentium M 765 | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pentium M 765 | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($0) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($20) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 765 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+
Pentium M 765
The Pentium M 765 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,834 points. Launch price was $69.
Athlon 64 X2 6000+
The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512K. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: AM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,825 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Pentium M 765 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Pentium M 765 versus 3.1 GHz on the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ — a 38.5% clock advantage for the Athlon 64 X2 6000+. The Pentium M 765 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 765 scores 1,834 against the Athlon 64 X2 6000+'s 1,825 — a 0.5% lead for the Pentium M 765. Both processors carry 0 kB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Pentium M 765 | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 2 / 2+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz | 3.1 GHz+48% |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+300% | 512K |
| Process | 90 nm | 90 nm |
| Architecture | Dothan (2004−2005) | Windsor (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 1,834 | 1,825 |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium M 765 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Athlon 64 X2 6000+ uses AM2 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR2-533 memory speed. The Athlon 64 X2 6000+ supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 120% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Pentium M 765) vs 0 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+) — the Pentium M 765 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 915GM,945GT (Pentium M 765) and AMD AM2 (Athlon 64 X2 6000+).
| Feature | Pentium M 765 | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | AM2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-533 | DDR2-800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 16 GB+300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: false (Pentium M 765) / not specified (Athlon 64 X2 6000+).
| Feature | Pentium M 765 | Athlon 64 X2 6000+ |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | false | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Pentium M 765 and Athlon 64 X2 6000+
