Pentium M 765 vs Atom C3508
Pentium M 765
Atom C3508
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium M 765 is positioned at rank 918 and the Atom C3508 is on rank 409, so the Atom C3508 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pentium M 765
Performance Per Dollar Atom C3508
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pentium M 765 | Atom C3508 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ✅ Better multi-core power | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Dothan (2004−2005) / 90 nm) | ✨ Modern (Goldmont (2016−2017) / 14 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pentium M 765 | Atom C3508 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium M 765 and Atom C3508
Pentium M 765
The Pentium M 765 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 7.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR2. Passmark benchmark score: 1,834 points. Launch price was $69.
Atom C3508
The Atom C3508 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 15 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Goldmont (2016−2017) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1310. Thermal design power (TDP): 11.5 Watt. Memory support: DDR4: 1866. Passmark benchmark score: 1,831 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Pentium M 765 packs 1 cores / 1 threads, while the Atom C3508 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Atom C3508 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.1 GHz on the Pentium M 765 versus 1.6 GHz on the Atom C3508 — a 27% clock advantage for the Pentium M 765 (base: 2.1 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Pentium M 765 uses the Dothan (2004−2005) architecture (90 nm), while the Atom C3508 uses Goldmont (2016−2017) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium M 765 scores 1,834 against the Atom C3508's 1,831 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium M 765. L3 cache: 0 kB on the Pentium M 765 vs 8 MB on the Atom C3508.
| Feature | Pentium M 765 | Atom C3508 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 1 / 1 | 4 / 4+300% |
| Boost Clock | 2.1 GHz+31% | 1.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz+31% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 0 kB | 8 MB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 8 MB+300% |
| Process | 90 nm | 14 nm-84% |
| Architecture | Dothan (2004−2005) | Goldmont (2016−2017) |
| PassMark | 1,834 | 1,831 |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium M 765 uses the PGA478 socket (PCIe 1.1), while the Atom C3508 uses FCBGA1310 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR2-533 on the Pentium M 765 versus DDR4-1866 on the Atom C3508 — the Atom C3508 supports 66.7% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Atom C3508 supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 4 GB — 193.8% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Pentium M 765) vs 12 (Atom C3508) — the Pentium M 765 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: 915GM,945GT (Pentium M 765) and Intel FCBGA1310 (Atom C3508).
| Feature | Pentium M 765 | Atom C3508 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA478 | FCBGA1310 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 1.1 | PCIe 3.0+173% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR2-533 | DDR4-1866+100% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 4 GB | 256 GB+6300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16+33% | 12 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: false (Pentium M 765) / not specified (Atom C3508).
| Feature | Pentium M 765 | Atom C3508 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | No | — |
| AVX-512 | No | — |
| Virtualization | false | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Pentium M 765 and Atom C3508
