
Pentium P6100 vs Athlon II X4 635

Pentium P6100

Athlon II X4 635
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium P6100 is positioned at rank 825 and the Athlon II X4 635 is on rank 1069, so the Pentium P6100 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pentium P6100
Performance Per Dollar Athlon II X4 635
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pentium P6100 | Athlon II X4 635 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ✅ More affordable ($16.39) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($250) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Propus (2009−2011) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pentium P6100 | Athlon II X4 635 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1423%) | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅ More affordable ($16.39) | ⚠️ Higher cost ($250) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium P6100 and Athlon II X4 635

Pentium P6100
The Pentium P6100 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 26 September 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,245 points. Launch price was $12.

Athlon II X4 635
The Athlon II X4 635 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Propus (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,248 points. Launch price was $70.
Processing Power
The Pentium P6100 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Athlon II X4 635 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the Athlon II X4 635 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2 GHz on the Pentium P6100 versus 2.9 GHz on the Athlon II X4 635 — a 36.7% clock advantage for the Athlon II X4 635 (base: 2 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Pentium P6100 uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Athlon II X4 635 uses Propus (2009−2011) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium P6100 scores 2,245 against the Athlon II X4 635's 2,248 — a 0.1% lead for the Athlon II X4 635. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium P6100 vs 0 kB on the Athlon II X4 635.
| Feature | Pentium P6100 | Athlon II X4 635 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 4 / 4+100% |
| Boost Clock | 2 GHz | 2.9 GHz+45% |
| Base Clock | 2 GHz | 2.9 GHz+45% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 512 kB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Propus (2009−2011) |
| PassMark | 2,245 | 2,248 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 658 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 180 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 550 |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium P6100 uses the PGA988 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon II X4 635 uses AM3 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Pentium P6100 | Athlon II X4 635 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | PGA988 | AM3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 / DDR2-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Pentium P6100) / AMD-V (Athlon II X4 635). Primary use case: Athlon II X4 635 targets Budget.
| Feature | Pentium P6100 | Athlon II X4 635 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Pentium P6100 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Athlon II X4 635 debuted at $400. At current prices ($16.39 vs $250), the Pentium P6100 is $234 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium P6100 delivers 137.0 pts/$ vs 9.0 pts/$ for the Athlon II X4 635 — making the Pentium P6100 the 175.4% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium P6100 | Athlon II X4 635 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $100-75% | $400 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $16.39-93% | $250 |
| Performance per Dollar | 137.0+1422% | 9.0 |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















