Pentium Silver N6000
VS
Athlon X4 760K

Pentium Silver N6000 vs Athlon X4 760K

Intel

Pentium Silver N6000

4 Cores4 Thrd6 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2021
VS
AMD

Athlon X4 760K

4 Cores4 Thrd100 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2013

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium Silver N6000 is positioned at rank 695 and the Athlon X4 760K is on rank 599, so the Athlon X4 760K offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium Silver N6000

#683
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
982%
#684
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
967%
#685
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
888%
#686
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
884%
#687
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
876%
#689
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
846%
#690
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
811%
#691
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
810%
#692
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
788%
#695
Pentium Silver N6000
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#696
Processor N95
MSRP: $160|Avg: $80
100%
#699
Athlon Silver 3050e
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
100%
#704
C-60
MSRP: $50|Avg: $20
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X4 760K

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10453%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9877%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
7172%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2161%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1711%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1497%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
857%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
846%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
771%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
770%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
762%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
741%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
731%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
728%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
721%
#279
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
MSRP: $799|Avg: $265
97%
#280
Core i7-7820X
MSRP: $599|Avg: $198
96%
#599
Athlon X4 760K
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
100%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
100%
#602
Pentium G3460T
MSRP: $69|Avg: N/A
99%
#603
Core i3-6300
MSRP: $147|Avg: $99
99%
#604
Core i5-6402P
MSRP: $182|Avg: $120
98%
#605
Athlon II X4 620e
MSRP: $99|Avg: $40
98%
#606
Core i5-7600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $114
98%
#608
FX-9590
MSRP: $350|Avg: $100
98%
#611
Athlon X4 750
MSRP: $95|Avg: $95
97%
#613
A6-3600
MSRP: $95|Avg: $25
96%
#614
Core i7-7740X
MSRP: $339|Avg: $150
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Pentium Silver N6000 (2021) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPentium Silver N6000Athlon X4 760K
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)
Longevity
✨ Modern (Jasper Lake (2021) / 10 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Richland (2013−2014) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Athlon X4 760K (2013) relies on 32 nm technology and DDR3-1866, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPentium Silver N6000Athlon X4 760K
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($20)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium Silver N6000 and Athlon X4 760K

Intel

Pentium Silver N6000

The Pentium Silver N6000 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.5 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1338. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,989 points. Launch price was $69.

AMD

Athlon X4 760K

The Athlon X4 760K is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Richland (2013−2014) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 3.8 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L2 cache: 4 MB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: FM2. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 2,982 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium Silver N6000 and Athlon X4 760K share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the Pentium Silver N6000 versus 4.1 GHz on the Athlon X4 760K — a 21.6% clock advantage for the Athlon X4 760K (base: 1.1 GHz vs 3.8 GHz). The Pentium Silver N6000 uses the Jasper Lake (2021) architecture (10 nm), while the Athlon X4 760K uses Richland (2013−2014) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium Silver N6000 scores 2,989 against the Athlon X4 760K's 2,982 — a 0.2% lead for the Pentium Silver N6000. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 473 vs 495, a 4.5% lead for the Athlon X4 760K that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 1,090 vs 1,404 (25.2% advantage for the Athlon X4 760K).

FeaturePentium Silver N6000Athlon X4 760K
Cores / Threads
4 / 4
4 / 4
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz
4.1 GHz+24%
Base Clock
1.1 GHz
3.8 GHz+245%
L3 Cache
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
1.5 MB (total)
4 MB+167%
Process
10 nm-69%
32 nm
Architecture
Jasper Lake (2021)
Richland (2013−2014)
PassMark
2,989
2,982
Cinebench R23 Multi
1,911
Geekbench 6 Single
473
495+5%
Geekbench 6 Multi
1,090
1,404+29%
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium Silver N6000 uses the BGA1338 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Athlon X4 760K uses FM2 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2933 on the Pentium Silver N6000 versus DDR3-1866 on the Athlon X4 760K — the Pentium Silver N6000 supports 28.6% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Athlon X4 760K supports up to 32 GB of RAM compared to 16 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 8 (Pentium Silver N6000) vs 16 (Athlon X4 760K) — the Athlon X4 760K offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: SoC (Pentium Silver N6000) and A55,A75,A85X,A88X (Athlon X4 760K).

FeaturePentium Silver N6000Athlon X4 760K
Socket
BGA1338
FM2
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2933+33%
DDR3-1866
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
32 GB+100%
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
16+100%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Athlon X4 760K has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Pentium Silver N6000) vs AMD-V (Athlon X4 760K). The Pentium Silver N6000 includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (32 EU)), while the Athlon X4 760K requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium Silver N6000 targets Budget, Athlon X4 760K targets Budget. Direct competitor: Pentium Silver N6000 rivals Celeron N5105.

FeaturePentium Silver N6000Athlon X4 760K
Integrated GPU
Yes
No
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics (32 EU)
Unlocked
No
Yes
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
AMD-V
Target Use
Budget
Budget