
Pentium U5400

Celeron E3500
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium U5400 is positioned at rank 1219 and the Celeron E3500 is on rank 778, so the Celeron E3500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pentium U5400
Performance Per Dollar Celeron E3500
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pentium U5400 | Celeron E3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ❌ Lower gaming performance | ✅ Superior gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($214) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Wolfdale (2008−2010) / 45 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pentium U5400 | Celeron E3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+2047%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($214) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

League of Legends
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pentium U5400 and Celeron E3500

Pentium U5400
The Pentium U5400 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.2 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,286 points. Launch price was $69.

Celeron E3500
The Celeron E3500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 29 August 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Wolfdale (2008−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 2.7 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB (total). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,290 points. Launch price was $62.
Processing Power
Both the Pentium U5400 and Celeron E3500 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.2 GHz on the Pentium U5400 versus 2.7 GHz on the Celeron E3500 — a 76.9% clock advantage for the Celeron E3500 (base: 1.2 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Pentium U5400 uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron E3500 uses Wolfdale (2008−2010) (45 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium U5400 scores 1,286 against the Celeron E3500's 1,290 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron E3500. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 170 vs 347, a 68.5% lead for the Celeron E3500 that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 300 vs 624 (70.1% advantage for the Celeron E3500). L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium U5400 vs 0 kB on the Celeron E3500.
| Feature | Pentium U5400 | Celeron E3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 2 / 2 | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 1.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz+125% |
| Base Clock | 1.2 GHz | 2.7 GHz+125% |
| L3 Cache | 3 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 256K (per core) | 1 MB (total)+300% |
| Process | 32 nm-29% | 45 nm |
| Architecture | Arrandale (2010−2011) | Wolfdale (2008−2010) |
| PassMark | 1,286 | 1,290 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 170 | 347+104% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 300 | 624+108% |
Memory & Platform
The Pentium U5400 uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron E3500 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR3-800 memory speed. Both support up to 8 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Pentium U5400) vs 0 (Celeron E3500) — the Pentium U5400 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: HM55 (Pentium U5400) and G31,G41,P45 (Celeron E3500).
| Feature | Pentium U5400 | Celeron E3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | BGA1288 | LGA775 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0+82% | PCIe 1.1 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-800 | DDR3-1066 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ❌ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Both support VT-x virtualization. The Pentium U5400 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake)), while the Celeron E3500 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Pentium U5400 targets Legacy Budget Laptop, Celeron E3500 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E3500 rivals Pentium E5200.
| Feature | Pentium U5400 | Celeron E3500 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel HD Graphics (Ironlake) | — |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x | VT-x |
| Target Use | Legacy Budget Laptop | Budget |
Value Analysis
The Pentium U5400 launched at $289 MSRP, while the Celeron E3500 debuted at $62. At current prices ($214 vs $10), the Celeron E3500 is $204 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium U5400 delivers 6.0 pts/$ vs 129.0 pts/$ for the Celeron E3500 — making the Celeron E3500 the 182.2% better value option.
| Feature | Pentium U5400 | Celeron E3500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $289 | $62-79% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $214 | $10-95% |
| Performance per Dollar | 6.0 | 129.0+2050% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2010 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













