Pentium U5600
VS
Celeron E1600

Pentium U5600 vs Celeron E1600

Intel

Pentium U5600

2 Cores2 Thrd18 WWMax: 1.33 GHz2011
VS
Intel

Celeron E1600

2 Cores2 Thrd65 WWMax: 2.4 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pentium U5600 is positioned at rank 1122 and the Celeron E1600 is on rank 896, so the Celeron E1600 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pentium U5600

#1110
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3514%
#1111
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3462%
#1112
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
3178%
#1113
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
3164%
#1114
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
3135%
#1116
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
3028%
#1117
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2903%
#1118
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2898%
#1119
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2820%
#1122
Pentium U5600
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
100%
#1124
Core m5-6Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
100%
#1125
Core i7-610E
MSRP: $250|Avg: $40
99%
#1126
Core i5-5350U
MSRP: $315|Avg: N/A
98%
#1127
Pentium Dual Core T4300
MSRP: $150|Avg: $99
98%
#1128
Core i7-3520M
MSRP: $346|Avg: N/A
98%
#1129
Core i3-4100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
98%
#1130
Core i3-2310E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $20
98%
#1131
Core i5-2510E
MSRP: $230|Avg: $30
98%
#1132
Core m5-6Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
98%
#1134
Core i3-2330E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $10
97%
#1135
Core i5-4288U
MSRP: $342|Avg: N/A
93%
#1136
Core m3-6Y30
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
93%
#1137
Core i3-2340UE
MSRP: $200|Avg: $200
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron E1600

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
20268%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
19151%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
13905%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
4189%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
3318%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
2903%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
1663%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
1641%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1494%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1494%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1477%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1437%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1417%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1412%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1399%
#299
Core i9-7980XE
MSRP: $1999|Avg: $300
96%
#896
Celeron E1600
MSRP: $53|Avg: $10
100%
#897
Athlon II X2 270u
MSRP: $68|Avg: $10
100%
#898
Core i5-4570TE
MSRP: $202|Avg: $40
99%
#899
Core i3-2130
MSRP: $138|Avg: $138
97%
#902
Core i3-6100E
MSRP: $225|Avg: $50
96%
#903
Core i3-4330TE
MSRP: $138|Avg: $15
95%
#904
Pentium E5700
MSRP: $75|Avg: $15
95%
#906
Athlon II X3 420e
MSRP: $107|Avg: $15
95%
#908
Celeron E1500
MSRP: $53|Avg: $5
94%
#909
Pentium G6950
MSRP: $87|Avg: $25
94%
#910
Pentium J4205
MSRP: $161|Avg: $161
93%
#911
Core i3-2120
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Celeron E1600 leads in gaming performance. However, the Pentium U5600 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 2.4% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPentium U5600Celeron E1600
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Arrandale (2010−2011) / 32 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Allendale (2006−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Celeron E1600 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 80% cheaper ($10 vs $50) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPentium U5600Celeron E1600
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+388%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($50)
More affordable ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pentium U5600 and Celeron E1600

Intel

Pentium U5600

The Pentium U5600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.33 GHz, with boost up to 1.33 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1288. Thermal design power (TDP): 18 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 835 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Celeron E1600

The Celeron E1600 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2007-01-01. It is based on the Allendale (2006−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 2.4 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 512 kB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA775. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR1, DDR2, DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 815 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

Both the Pentium U5600 and Celeron E1600 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.33 GHz on the Pentium U5600 versus 2.4 GHz on the Celeron E1600 — a 57.4% clock advantage for the Celeron E1600 (base: 1.33 GHz vs 2.4 GHz). The Pentium U5600 uses the Arrandale (2010−2011) architecture (32 nm), while the Celeron E1600 uses Allendale (2006−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Pentium U5600 scores 835 against the Celeron E1600's 815 — a 2.4% lead for the Pentium U5600. L3 cache: 3 MB (total) on the Pentium U5600 vs 0 kB on the Celeron E1600.

FeaturePentium U5600Celeron E1600
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.33 GHz
2.4 GHz+80%
Base Clock
1.33 GHz
2.4 GHz+80%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
256K (per core)
512 kB (total)+100%
Process
32 nm-51%
65 nm
Architecture
Arrandale (2010−2011)
Allendale (2006−2009)
PassMark
835+2%
815
Geekbench 6 Single
310
Geekbench 6 Multi
560
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pentium U5600 uses the BGA1288 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron E1600 uses LGA775 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePentium U5600Celeron E1600
Socket
BGA1288
LGA775
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pentium U5600) / No (Celeron E1600). Primary use case: Celeron E1600 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron E1600 rivals Pentium E2220.

FeaturePentium U5600Celeron E1600
Integrated GPU
No
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
No
Target Use
Budget
💰

Value Analysis

The Pentium U5600 launched at $100 MSRP, while the Celeron E1600 debuted at $53. At current prices ($50 vs $10), the Celeron E1600 is $40 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Pentium U5600 delivers 16.7 pts/$ vs 81.5 pts/$ for the Celeron E1600 — making the Celeron E1600 the 132% better value option.

FeaturePentium U5600Celeron E1600
MSRP
$100
$53-47%
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$10-80%
Performance per Dollar
16.7
81.5+388%
Release Date
2011
2009