Phenom II X2 550
VS
Celeron G460

Phenom II X2 550 vs Celeron G460

AMD

Phenom II X2 550

2 Cores2 Thrd80 WWMax: 3.1 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Celeron G460

1 Cores2 Thrd35 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X2 550 is positioned at rank 516 and the Celeron G460 is on rank 586, so the Phenom II X2 550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X2 550

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
8188%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7737%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5618%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1692%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1341%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1173%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
672%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
663%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
604%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
604%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
597%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
581%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
573%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
570%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
565%
#262
Core i7-8700K
MSRP: $359|Avg: $160
99%
#374
Core i9-13900TE
MSRP: $554|Avg: $554
98%
#516
Phenom II X2 550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#517
Pentium G2030T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
100%
#518
Athlon X4 730
MSRP: $60|Avg: $52
100%
#519
Core i3-7101E
MSRP: $117|Avg: $50
99%
#521
Athlon II X4 740
MSRP: $71|Avg: $20
99%
#524
Celeron G1840T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $10
99%
#526
Pentium G4500
MSRP: $75|Avg: $34
98%
#527
Athlon X4 740
MSRP: $71|Avg: $71
98%
#528
Xeon E5-2608L v4
MSRP: $363|Avg: $174
98%
#530
Celeron G1610
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron G460

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
10072%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
9517%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
6910%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
2082%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1649%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1442%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
826%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
815%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
742%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
742%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
734%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
714%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
704%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
701%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
695%
#278
Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
MSRP: $549|Avg: $116
99%
#382
Ryzen Embedded R2544
MSRP: $280|Avg: $280
98%
#586
Celeron G460
MSRP: $37|Avg: $10
100%
#587
A4 PRO-7350B
MSRP: $50|Avg: $11
100%
#589
Pentium G3220T
MSRP: $54|Avg: $15
99%
#590
Celeron G1620
MSRP: $52|Avg: $40
99%
#591
Core i5-7600T
MSRP: $192|Avg: $60
98%
#593
Core i3-7300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $128
97%
#594
Celeron G1830
MSRP: $52|Avg: $5
97%
#596
Core i3-4160
MSRP: $117|Avg: $52
97%
#598
FX-8350
MSRP: $199|Avg: $130
96%
#599
Athlon X4 760K
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
96%
#600
Core i5-6400
MSRP: $182|Avg: $57
96%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Phenom II X2 550 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron G460 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.3% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPhenom II X2 550Celeron G460
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Callisto (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPhenom II X2 550Celeron G460
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($10)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X2 550 and Celeron G460

AMD

Phenom II X2 550

The Phenom II X2 550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 November 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Callisto (2009−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,142 points. Launch price was $133.

Intel

Celeron G460

The Celeron G460 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 December 2011 (13 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB. L2 cache: 256 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1155. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,145 points. Launch price was $65.

Processing Power

The Phenom II X2 550 packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the Celeron G460 offers 1 cores / 2 threads — the Phenom II X2 550 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3.1 GHz on the Phenom II X2 550 versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron G460 — a 53.1% clock advantage for the Phenom II X2 550 (base: 3.1 GHz vs 1.8 GHz). The Phenom II X2 550 uses the Callisto (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron G460 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X2 550 scores 1,142 against the Celeron G460's 1,145 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron G460. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X2 550 vs 1.5 MB on the Celeron G460.

FeaturePhenom II X2 550Celeron G460
Cores / Threads
2 / 2+100%
1 / 2
Boost Clock
3.1 GHz+72%
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
3.1 GHz+72%
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+300%
1.5 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256 kB
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Callisto (2009−2010)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,142
1,145
Geekbench 6 Single
300
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X2 550 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron G460 uses LGA1155 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom II X2 550Celeron G460
Socket
AM3
LGA1155
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1066
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Phenom II X2 550) / VT-x (Celeron G460). The Celeron G460 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Phenom II X2 550 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron G460 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron G460 rivals Pentium G630.

FeaturePhenom II X2 550Celeron G460
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget