Phenom II X2 B57
VS
Celeron 847

Phenom II X2 B57 vs Celeron 847

AMD

Phenom II X2 B57

2 Cores2 Thrd80 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2010
VS
Intel

Celeron 847

2 Cores2 Thrd17 WWMax: 1.1 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X2 B57 is positioned at rank 484 and the Celeron 847 is on rank 1093, so the Phenom II X2 B57 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X2 B57

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
7422%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
7013%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
5092%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1534%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1215%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
1063%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
609%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
601%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
547%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
547%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
541%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
526%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
519%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
517%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
512%
#369
Core i5-8400T
MSRP: $182|Avg: $179
99%
#370
Athlon 240GE
MSRP: $75|Avg: $110
99%
#484
Phenom II X2 B57
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#487
Pentium Dual-Core E2220
MSRP: $32|Avg: $32
99%
#491
Pentium G4600T
MSRP: $75|Avg: $35
97%
#493
Core i5-6500T
MSRP: $117|Avg: $35
97%
#494
FX-6330
MSRP: $109|Avg: $25
97%
#495
Celeron G1630
MSRP: $42|Avg: $5
97%
#499
Pentium G4400
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 847

#1081
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
3095%
#1082
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
3050%
#1083
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
2800%
#1084
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
2787%
#1085
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
2761%
#1087
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
2667%
#1088
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
2557%
#1089
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
2553%
#1090
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
2484%
#1093
Celeron 847
MSRP: $134|Avg: $15
100%
#1094
Core i7-2630QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1096
Core i7-2635QM
MSRP: $378|Avg: N/A
99%
#1097
Celeron 877
MSRP: $86|Avg: $15
99%
#1098
Celeron Dual-Core SU2300
MSRP: $134|Avg: $50
98%
#1099
Core i5-3337U
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
98%
#1100
Core i5-2450M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
97%
#1101
Core i5-7Y54
MSRP: $281|Avg: $100
97%
#1102
Core i5-7Y57
MSRP: $281|Avg: $281
97%
#1104
Pentium 997
MSRP: $134|Avg: $10
96%
#1105
Pentium A1018
MSRP: $132|Avg: $15
95%
#1106
Core i5-2430M
MSRP: $225|Avg: N/A
95%
#1108
Pentium Dual Core T4500
MSRP: $150|Avg: $30
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Phenom II X2 B57 leads in gaming performance. However, the Celeron 847 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.8% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPhenom II X2 B57Celeron 847
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Callisto (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPhenom II X2 B57Celeron 847
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X2 B57 and Celeron 847

AMD

Phenom II X2 B57

The Phenom II X2 B57 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Callisto (2009−2010) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,260 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Celeron 847

The Celeron 847 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.1 GHz, with boost up to 1.1 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,270 points. Launch price was $134.

Processing Power

Both the Phenom II X2 B57 and Celeron 847 share an identical 2-core/2-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Phenom II X2 B57 versus 1.1 GHz on the Celeron 847 — a 97.7% clock advantage for the Phenom II X2 B57 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 1.1 GHz). The Phenom II X2 B57 uses the Callisto (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron 847 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X2 B57 scores 1,260 against the Celeron 847's 1,270 — a 0.8% lead for the Celeron 847. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X2 B57 vs 2 MB (total) on the Celeron 847.

FeaturePhenom II X2 B57Celeron 847
Cores / Threads
2 / 2
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+191%
1.1 GHz
Base Clock
3.2 GHz+191%
1.1 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+200%
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256K (per core)
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Callisto (2009−2010)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,260
1,270
Geekbench 6 Single
196
Geekbench 6 Multi
354
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X2 B57 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 847 uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom II X2 B57Celeron 847
Socket
AM3
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Phenom II X2 B57) / VT-x (Celeron 847). The Celeron 847 includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Phenom II X2 B57 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 847 targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 847 rivals Pentium 967.

FeaturePhenom II X2 B57Celeron 847
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x
Target Use
Budget