Phenom II X3 720
VS
Athlon X2 QL-64

Phenom II X3 720 vs Athlon X2 QL-64

AMD

Phenom II X3 720

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2010
VS
AMD

Athlon X2 QL-64

2 Cores2 Thrd1 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2009

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X3 720 is positioned at rank 957 and the Athlon X2 QL-64 is on rank 665, so the Athlon X2 QL-64 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X3 720

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
25322%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
23927%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
17373%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
5234%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
4146%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
3627%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
2077%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
2050%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
1867%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
1866%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
1846%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
1796%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
1771%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
1764%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
1748%
#957
Phenom II X3 720
MSRP: $130|Avg: $64
100%
#958
Pentium E6300
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
100%
#959
Core i5-661
MSRP: $196|Avg: $40
99%
#960
Core i5-750
MSRP: $210|Avg: $30
98%
#961
Core i3-4150
MSRP: $281|Avg: $70
98%
#962
Core i3-2100T
MSRP: $127|Avg: $127
98%
#963
Pentium E2210
MSRP: $84|Avg: $15
97%
#964
Core i3-560
MSRP: $138|Avg: $10
97%
#965
Core i3-550
MSRP: $138|Avg: $5
96%
#966
Core i7-980
MSRP: $583|Avg: $50
96%
#967
Pentium G3250
MSRP: $171|Avg: $25
95%
#968
Pentium E2200
MSRP: $84|Avg: $5
95%
#969
Core 2 Duo E7300
MSRP: $133|Avg: $133
95%
#970
Core i3-540
MSRP: $133|Avg: $5
95%
#972
Phenom II X3 700e
MSRP: $125|Avg: $40
94%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon X2 QL-64

#653
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
909%
#654
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
896%
#655
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
822%
#656
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
818%
#657
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
811%
#659
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
783%
#660
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
751%
#661
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
750%
#662
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
730%
#665
Athlon X2 QL-64
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
100%
#666
Core 3 N350
MSRP: $225|Avg: $220
100%
#668
FX-7500
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Phenom II X3 720 leads in gaming performance. However, the Athlon X2 QL-64 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.9% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPhenom II X3 720Athlon X2 QL-64
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($64)
More affordable ($15)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Heka (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Lion (2008−2009) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

Efficiency: Even within a comparison of older hardware, the Athlon X2 QL-64 stands out as the superior choice. It is effectively 77% cheaper ($15 vs $64) while identifying as the stronger performer.
InsightPhenom II X3 720Athlon X2 QL-64
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+330%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($64)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X3 720 and Athlon X2 QL-64

AMD

Phenom II X3 720

The Phenom II X3 720 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Heka (2009−2010) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $75.

AMD

Athlon X2 QL-64

The Athlon X2 QL-64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,614 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Phenom II X3 720 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Athlon X2 QL-64 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Phenom II X3 720 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X3 720 versus 2.1 GHz on the Athlon X2 QL-64 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Phenom II X3 720. The Phenom II X3 720 uses the Heka (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon X2 QL-64 uses Lion (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X3 720 scores 1,600 against the Athlon X2 QL-64's 1,614 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon X2 QL-64. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X3 720 vs 0 kB on the Athlon X2 QL-64.

FeaturePhenom II X3 720Athlon X2 QL-64
Cores / Threads
3 / 3+50%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+33%
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB+100%
Process
45 nm-31%
65 nm
Architecture
Heka (2009−2010)
Lion (2008−2009)
PassMark
1,600
1,614
Geekbench 6 Single
380
Geekbench 6 Multi
980
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X3 720 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X2 QL-64 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Phenom II X3 720 versus DDR2-667 on the Athlon X2 QL-64 — the Phenom II X3 720 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Phenom II X3 720 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Phenom II X3 720) vs 0 (Athlon X2 QL-64) — the Phenom II X3 720 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM3,AM2+ (Phenom II X3 720) and Socket S1 (Athlon X2 QL-64).

FeaturePhenom II X3 720Athlon X2 QL-64
Socket
AM3
S1
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333+50%
DDR2-667
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB+100%
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
0
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Phenom II X3 720 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Phenom II X3 720 targets Legacy Desktop.

FeaturePhenom II X3 720Athlon X2 QL-64
Integrated GPU
No
No
IGPU Model
None
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
No
No
Virtualization
AMD-V
AMD-V
Target Use
Legacy Desktop
💰

Value Analysis

The Phenom II X3 720 launched at $130 MSRP, while the Athlon X2 QL-64 debuted at $50. At current prices ($64 vs $15), the Athlon X2 QL-64 is $49 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Phenom II X3 720 delivers 25.0 pts/$ vs 107.6 pts/$ for the Athlon X2 QL-64 — making the Athlon X2 QL-64 the 124.6% better value option.

FeaturePhenom II X3 720Athlon X2 QL-64
MSRP
$130
$50-62%
Avg Price (30d)
$64
$15-77%
Performance per Dollar
25.0
107.6+330%
Release Date
2010
2009