
Phenom II X3 720 vs Athlon X2 QL-64

Phenom II X3 720

Athlon X2 QL-64
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X3 720 is positioned at rank 957 and the Athlon X2 QL-64 is on rank 665, so the Athlon X2 QL-64 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X3 720
Performance Per Dollar Athlon X2 QL-64
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Phenom II X3 720 | Athlon X2 QL-64 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($64) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Heka (2009−2010) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Lion (2008−2009) / 65 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Phenom II X3 720 | Athlon X2 QL-64 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+330%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($64) | ✅ More affordable ($15) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X3 720 and Athlon X2 QL-64

Phenom II X3 720
The Phenom II X3 720 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 January 2010 (15 years ago). It is based on the Heka (2009−2010) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,600 points. Launch price was $75.

Athlon X2 QL-64
The Athlon X2 QL-64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Lion (2008−2009) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: S1. Thermal design power (TDP): 1 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 1,614 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Phenom II X3 720 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Athlon X2 QL-64 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Phenom II X3 720 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X3 720 versus 2.1 GHz on the Athlon X2 QL-64 — a 28.6% clock advantage for the Phenom II X3 720. The Phenom II X3 720 uses the Heka (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon X2 QL-64 uses Lion (2008−2009) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X3 720 scores 1,600 against the Athlon X2 QL-64's 1,614 — a 0.9% lead for the Athlon X2 QL-64. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X3 720 vs 0 kB on the Athlon X2 QL-64.
| Feature | Phenom II X3 720 | Athlon X2 QL-64 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 3 / 3+50% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 2.8 GHz+33% | 2.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | — |
| L3 Cache | 6 MB (total) | 0 kB |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core) | 1 MB+100% |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Heka (2009−2010) | Lion (2008−2009) |
| PassMark | 1,600 | 1,614 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 380 | — |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 980 | — |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X3 720 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon X2 QL-64 uses S1 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR3-1333 on the Phenom II X3 720 versus DDR2-667 on the Athlon X2 QL-64 — the Phenom II X3 720 supports 40% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Phenom II X3 720 supports up to 16 GB of RAM compared to 8 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 16 (Phenom II X3 720) vs 0 (Athlon X2 QL-64) — the Phenom II X3 720 offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM3,AM2+ (Phenom II X3 720) and Socket S1 (Athlon X2 QL-64).
| Feature | Phenom II X3 720 | Athlon X2 QL-64 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | S1 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR3-1333+50% | DDR2-667 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 16 GB+100% | 8 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | ✅ | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 0 |
Advanced Features
Only the Phenom II X3 720 has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Both support AMD-V virtualization. Primary use case: Phenom II X3 720 targets Legacy Desktop.
| Feature | Phenom II X3 720 | Athlon X2 QL-64 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | None | — |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | AMD-V |
| Target Use | Legacy Desktop | — |
Value Analysis
The Phenom II X3 720 launched at $130 MSRP, while the Athlon X2 QL-64 debuted at $50. At current prices ($64 vs $15), the Athlon X2 QL-64 is $49 cheaper. In terms of value (PassMark points per dollar), the Phenom II X3 720 delivers 25.0 pts/$ vs 107.6 pts/$ for the Athlon X2 QL-64 — making the Athlon X2 QL-64 the 124.6% better value option.
| Feature | Phenom II X3 720 | Athlon X2 QL-64 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $130 | $50-62% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $64 | $15-77% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.0 | 107.6+330% |
| Release Date | 2010 | 2009 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















