Phenom II X3 B73
VS
Core i7-2617M

Phenom II X3 B73 vs Core i7-2617M

AMD

Phenom II X3 B73

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2009
VS
Intel

Core i7-2617M

2 Cores4 Thrd17 WWMax: 2.6 GHz2011

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X3 B73 is positioned at rank 380 and the Core i7-2617M is on rank 287, so the Core i7-2617M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X3 B73

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5596%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5288%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3839%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1157%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
916%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
802%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
459%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
453%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
413%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
412%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
408%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
397%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
391%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
390%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
386%
#327
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $452
100%
#328
Core i9-9900KS
MSRP: $513|Avg: $350
99%
#329
Core i5-11600T
MSRP: $262|Avg: $262
99%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
98%
#331
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
MSRP: $899|Avg: $540
98%
#332
Celeron G4930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#333
Core i9-9920X
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $464
97%
#380
Phenom II X3 B73
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#385
Pentium G4560
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
99%
#392
A10-7860K
MSRP: $117|Avg: N/A
97%
#393
Athlon X4 845
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
97%
#395
Celeron G3930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $25
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i7-2617M

#82
Core i7-11700B
MSRP: $323|Avg: $311
99%
#83
Core i7-13700HX
MSRP: $485|Avg: N/A
98%
#86
Ryzen AI 9 HX PRO 370
MSRP: $500|Avg: $500
97%
#274
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
435%
#275
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
428%
#276
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
393%
#277
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
392%
#278
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
388%
#280
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
375%
#281
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
359%
#282
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
359%
#283
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
349%
#287
Core i7-2617M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Phenom II X3 B73 leads in gaming performance. However, the Core i7-2617M is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 1% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPhenom II X3 B73Core i7-2617M
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Heka (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPhenom II X3 B73Core i7-2617M
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X3 B73 and Core i7-2617M

AMD

Phenom II X3 B73

The Phenom II X3 B73 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 October 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Heka (2009−2010) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,671 points. Launch price was $75.

Intel

Core i7-2617M

The Core i7-2617M is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 January 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.5 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB. Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: BGA1023. Thermal design power (TDP): 17 Watt. Memory support: DDR3-1066, DDR3-1333. Passmark benchmark score: 1,687 points. Launch price was $100.

Processing Power

The Phenom II X3 B73 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Core i7-2617M offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Phenom II X3 B73 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 2.8 GHz on the Phenom II X3 B73 versus 2.6 GHz on the Core i7-2617M — a 7.4% clock advantage for the Phenom II X3 B73 (base: 2.8 GHz vs 1.5 GHz). The Phenom II X3 B73 uses the Heka (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Core i7-2617M uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X3 B73 scores 1,671 against the Core i7-2617M's 1,687 — a 1% lead for the Core i7-2617M. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X3 B73 vs 4 MB on the Core i7-2617M.

FeaturePhenom II X3 B73Core i7-2617M
Cores / Threads
3 / 3+50%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
2.8 GHz+8%
2.6 GHz
Base Clock
2.8 GHz+87%
1.5 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)+50%
4 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
512 kB
Process
45 nm
32 nm-29%
Architecture
Heka (2009−2010)
Sandy Bridge (2011−2013)
PassMark
1,671
1,687
Geekbench 6 Single
448
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X3 B73 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core i7-2617M uses BGA1023 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom II X3 B73Core i7-2617M
Socket
AM3
BGA1023
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 2.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3-1333
Max RAM Capacity
8 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
16
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Phenom II X3 B73) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i7-2617M). The Core i7-2617M includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 3000), while the Phenom II X3 B73 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i7-2617M targets Ultrabook. Direct competitor: Core i7-2617M rivals A6-3400M.

FeaturePhenom II X3 B73Core i7-2617M
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 3000
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Ultrabook