Phenom II X3 B75
VS
Athlon 64 FX-72

Phenom II X3 B75 vs Athlon 64 FX-72

AMD

Phenom II X3 B75

3 Cores3 Thrd95 WWMax: 3 GHz2009
VS
AMD

Athlon 64 FX-72

2 Cores2 Thrd125 WWMax: 2.8 GHz2006

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X3 B75 is positioned at rank 361 and the Athlon 64 FX-72 is on rank 1100, so the Phenom II X3 B75 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X3 B75

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5245%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
4956%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3599%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1084%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
859%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
751%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
430%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
425%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
387%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
387%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
382%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
372%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
367%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
365%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
362%
#319
Ryzen Embedded V1202B
MSRP: $100|Avg: $60
98%
#320
Core i3-10100
MSRP: $122|Avg: $146
98%
#321
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
MSRP: $311|Avg: $311
98%
#322
Celeron G6900
MSRP: $52|Avg: $77
97%
#323
Core i9-11900K
MSRP: $539|Avg: $435
97%
#324
Core i7-12700TE
MSRP: $378|Avg: $350
95%
#361
Phenom II X3 B75
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#365
Celeron G3920
MSRP: $40|Avg: $30
99%
#366
Ryzen 3 1200
MSRP: $109|Avg: $50
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Athlon 64 FX-72

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
138540%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
130907%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
95049%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
28634%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
22681%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
19842%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
11364%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
11216%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
10212%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
10212%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
10097%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
9825%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
9688%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
9648%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
9561%
#1100
Athlon 64 FX-72
MSRP: $799|Avg: $40
100%
#1101
Athlon 64 X2 4200+
MSRP: $581|Avg: $110
96%
#1102
Athlon 64 3500+
MSRP: $272|Avg: $10
93%
#1103
Pentium D 830
MSRP: $316|Avg: $20
87%
#1104
Pentium D 960
MSRP: $523|Avg: $15
85%
#1105
Athlon XP 2500+
MSRP: $172|Avg: $15
83%
#1106
Athlon 64 3800+
MSRP: $354|Avg: $10
81%
#1107
Pentium 4 2.53
MSRP: $193|Avg: $13
80%
#1108
Pentium 4 2.40
MSRP: $193|Avg: $193
75%
#1109
Athlon XP 2400+
MSRP: $193|Avg: $10
70%
#1110
Pentium D 950
MSRP: $637|Avg: $10
65%
#1111
Athlon XP 1500+
MSRP: $130|Avg: $15
64%
#1112
Athlon 64 4000+
MSRP: $482|Avg: $30
62%
#1113
Pentium 4 2.66
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
56%
#1114
Pentium 4 2.80
MSRP: $327|Avg: $25
56%
#1115
Athlon XP 1600+
MSRP: $160|Avg: $15
56%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Trade-off: The Phenom II X3 B75 leads in gaming performance. However, the Athlon 64 FX-72 is the stronger candidate for professional workloads, offering 0.6% greater multi-core processing power.
InsightPhenom II X3 B75Athlon 64 FX-72
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Heka (2009−2010) / 45 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Windsor (2006−2007) / 90 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPhenom II X3 B75Athlon 64 FX-72
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($0)
⚠️ Higher cost ($40)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X3 B75 and Athlon 64 FX-72

AMD

Phenom II X3 B75

The Phenom II X3 B75 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Heka (2009−2010) architecture. It features 3 cores and 3 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,783 points. Launch price was $149.

AMD

Athlon 64 FX-72

The Athlon 64 FX-72 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Windsor (2006−2007) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Max frequency: 2.8 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 90 nm process technology. Socket: F. Thermal design power (TDP): 125 Watt. Memory support: DDR1. Passmark benchmark score: 1,794 points. Launch price was $149.

Processing Power

The Phenom II X3 B75 packs 3 cores / 3 threads, while the Athlon 64 FX-72 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Phenom II X3 B75 has 1 more core. Boost clocks reach 3 GHz on the Phenom II X3 B75 versus 2.8 GHz on the Athlon 64 FX-72 — a 6.9% clock advantage for the Phenom II X3 B75. The Phenom II X3 B75 uses the Heka (2009−2010) architecture (45 nm), while the Athlon 64 FX-72 uses Windsor (2006−2007) (90 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X3 B75 scores 1,783 against the Athlon 64 FX-72's 1,794 — a 0.6% lead for the Athlon 64 FX-72. L3 cache: 6 MB (total) on the Phenom II X3 B75 vs 0 kB on the Athlon 64 FX-72.

FeaturePhenom II X3 B75Athlon 64 FX-72
Cores / Threads
3 / 3+50%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3 GHz+7%
2.8 GHz
Base Clock
3 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB+100%
Process
45 nm-50%
90 nm
Architecture
Heka (2009−2010)
Windsor (2006−2007)
PassMark
1,783
1,794
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom II X3 B75 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Athlon 64 FX-72 uses F (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom II X3 B75Athlon 64 FX-72
Socket
AM3
F
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1
Max RAM Speed
DDR2-800
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
0