Phenom II X4 810 vs Celeron B710
Phenom II X4 810
Celeron B710
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom II X4 810 is positioned at rank 312 and the Celeron B710 is on rank 811, so the Phenom II X4 810 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Phenom II X4 810
Performance Per Dollar Celeron B710
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Phenom II X4 810 | Celeron B710 |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | ✅ Superior gaming performance | ❌ Lower gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | ⚠️ Higher cost ($175) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Deneb (2009−2011) / 45 nm) | 🛑 Legacy (Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) / 32 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Phenom II X4 810 | Celeron B710 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ✅ Better overall value (+1663%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️ Higher cost ($175) | ✅ More affordable ($10) |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Phenom II X4 810 and Celeron B710
Phenom II X4 810
The Phenom II X4 810 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 9 February 2009 (16 years ago). It is based on the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 2.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: AM3. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,036 points. Launch price was $116.
Celeron B710
The Celeron B710 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 June 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) architecture. It features 1 cores and 1 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 1.5 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: PGA988. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,051 points. Launch price was $70.
Processing Power
The Phenom II X4 810 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron B710 offers 1 cores / 1 threads — the Phenom II X4 810 has 3 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.6 GHz on the Phenom II X4 810 versus 1.6 GHz on the Celeron B710 — a 47.6% clock advantage for the Phenom II X4 810 (base: 2.6 GHz vs 1.6 GHz). The Phenom II X4 810 uses the Deneb (2009−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Celeron B710 uses Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X4 810 scores 2,036 against the Celeron B710's 2,051 — a 0.7% lead for the Celeron B710. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Phenom II X4 810 vs 1.5 MB (total) on the Celeron B710.
| Feature | Phenom II X4 810 | Celeron B710 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+300% | 1 / 1 |
| Boost Clock | 2.6 GHz+63% | 1.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.6 GHz+63% | 1.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total)+167% | 1.5 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512 kB (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 45 nm | 32 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Deneb (2009−2011) | Sandy Bridge (2011−2013) |
| PassMark | 2,036 | 2,051 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 231 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 196 |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X4 810 uses the AM3 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron B710 uses PGA988 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Phenom II X4 810 | Celeron B710 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM3 | PGA988 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1333 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 16 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | ❌ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Phenom II X4 810) / VT-x (Celeron B710). The Celeron B710 includes integrated graphics (Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge)), while the Phenom II X4 810 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron B710 targets Laptop. Direct competitor: Celeron B710 rivals Pentium 967.
| Feature | Phenom II X4 810 | Celeron B710 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel HD Graphics (Sandy Bridge) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x |
| Target Use | — | Laptop |
Value Analysis
The Phenom II X4 810 launched at $175 MSRP, while the Celeron B710 debuted at $86.
| Feature | Phenom II X4 810 | Celeron B710 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $175 | $86-51% |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $10 |
| Release Date | 2009 | 2011 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Phenom II X4 810 and Celeron B710
