
Phenom II X4 P960

Xeon E5335
Phenom II X4 P960 vs Xeon E5335 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Phenom II X4 P960 vs Xeon E5335 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6

Call of Duty: Warzone
Phenom II X4 P960 vs Xeon E5335: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Phenom II X4 P960
2010Why buy it
- ✅Draws 2W instead of 80W, a 78W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (1,542 vs 1,549).
Xeon E5335
2006Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌3900% higher power demand at 80W vs 2W.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon E5335 better than Phenom II X4 P960?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Phenom II X4 P960 vs Xeon E5335 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Phenom II X4 P960
The Phenom II X4 P960 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 45 nm process technology. Socket: S1g4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,542 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5335
The Xeon E5335 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Clovertown (2006−2007) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB L2 Cache. L2 cache: 4 MB (total). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: LGA771. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR2, DDR3 Depends on motherboard. Passmark benchmark score: 1,549 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Phenom II X4 P960 and Xeon E5335 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Phenom II X4 P960 versus 2 GHz on the Xeon E5335 — a 10.5% clock advantage for the Xeon E5335. The Phenom II X4 P960 uses the Champlain (2010−2011) architecture (45 nm), while the Xeon E5335 uses Clovertown (2006−2007) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom II X4 P960 scores 1,542 against the Xeon E5335's 1,549 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon E5335.
| Feature | Phenom II X4 P960 | Xeon E5335 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4 | 4 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 1.8 GHz | 2 GHz+11% |
| Base Clock | — | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 8 MB L2 Cache |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB (total)+100% |
| Process | 45 nm-31% | 65 nm |
| Architecture | Champlain (2010−2011) | Clovertown (2006−2007) |
| PassMark | 1,542 | 1,549 |
Memory & Platform
The Phenom II X4 P960 uses the S1g4 socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5335 uses LGA771 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Phenom II X4 P960 | Xeon E5335 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | S1g4 | LGA771 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 2.0 | PCIe 2.0 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















