Phenom X4 9100e
VS
Celeron 4205U

Phenom X4 9100e vs Celeron 4205U

AMD

Phenom X4 9100e

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Celeron 4205U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom X4 9100e is positioned at rank 453 and the Celeron 4205U is on rank 152, so the Celeron 4205U offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9100e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6912%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6531%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4742%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1429%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1132%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
990%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
567%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
560%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
509%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
509%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
504%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
490%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
483%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
481%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
477%
#353
Core i9-11900T
MSRP: $439|Avg: $413
100%
#354
Ryzen Threadripper 7970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2200
100%
#355
Core i9-10900
MSRP: $483|Avg: $426
100%
#356
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#357
Core i9-10900K
MSRP: $499|Avg: $500
99%
#358
Celeron G4930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $57
99%
#359
Ryzen 7 2700E
MSRP: $329|Avg: $329
99%
#360
Ryzen Embedded V2516
MSRP: $300|Avg: $300
99%
#361
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
MSRP: $2499|Avg: $2442
98%
#453
Phenom X4 9100e
MSRP: $200|Avg: $35
100%
#457
Celeron G3950
MSRP: $52|Avg: $30
100%
#462
Athlon X2 340
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
99%
#466
Pentium G4600
MSRP: $82|Avg: $116
98%
#467
Celeron G3900TE
MSRP: $42|Avg: $45
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 4205U

#42
Ryzen 9 9955HX3D
MSRP: $749|Avg: N/A
98%
#140
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
326%
#141
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
321%
#142
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
295%
#143
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
294%
#144
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
291%
#146
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
281%
#147
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
269%
#148
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
269%
#149
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
262%
#152
Celeron 4205U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#158
Core i5-3210M
MSRP: $225|Avg: $30
98%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 4205U (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPhenom X4 9100eCeleron 4205U
Gaming
Balanced gaming performance
Balanced gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
More affordable ($0)
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm)
✨ Modern (Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom X4 9100e (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPhenom X4 9100eCeleron 4205U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
⚠️ Higher cost ($35)
More affordable ($0)

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom X4 9100e and Celeron 4205U

AMD

Phenom X4 9100e

The Phenom X4 9100e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,353 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Celeron 4205U

The Celeron 4205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 23 January 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,350 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

The Phenom X4 9100e packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron 4205U offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Phenom X4 9100e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Phenom X4 9100e versus 1.8 GHz on the Celeron 4205U — identical boost frequencies. The Phenom X4 9100e uses the Agena (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron 4205U uses Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom X4 9100e scores 1,353 against the Celeron 4205U's 1,350 — a 0.2% lead for the Phenom X4 9100e. Both processors carry 2 MB (total) of L3 cache.

FeaturePhenom X4 9100eCeleron 4205U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
1.8 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
2 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)+100%
256 kB (per core)
Process
65 nm
14 nm-78%
Architecture
Agena (2007−2008)
Whiskey Lake-U (2018−2019)
PassMark
1,353
1,350
Geekbench 6 Single
347
Geekbench 6 Multi
585
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom X4 9100e uses the AM2+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 4205U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom X4 9100eCeleron 4205U
Socket
AM2+
FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2133
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Phenom X4 9100e) / VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 4205U). The Celeron 4205U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics 610), while the Phenom X4 9100e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 4205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 4205U rivals Pentium Gold 4417U.

FeaturePhenom X4 9100eCeleron 4205U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics 610
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget