Phenom X4 9150e
VS
Celeron 5205U

Phenom X4 9150e vs Celeron 5205U

AMD

Phenom X4 9150e

4 Cores4 Thrd65 WWMax: 1.8 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Celeron 5205U

2 Cores2 Thrd15 WWMax: 1.9 GHz2019

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom X4 9150e is positioned at rank 438 and the Celeron 5205U is on rank 1231, so the Phenom X4 9150e offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9150e

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
6553%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
6192%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
4496%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1354%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
1073%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
938%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
538%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
531%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
483%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
483%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
478%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
465%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
458%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
456%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
452%
#347
Celeron G5905T
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
99%
#348
Athlon PRO 200GE
MSRP: $55|Avg: $81
99%
#349
Core i5-9600
MSRP: $224|Avg: $219
99%
#350
Core i3-8300
MSRP: $138|Avg: $136
98%
#351
Core i5-8500B
MSRP: $192|Avg: $192
97%
#352
Core i7-13700TE
MSRP: $390|Avg: $476
97%
#438
Phenom X4 9150e
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#444
Pentium G4560T
MSRP: $64|Avg: $20
98%
#449
Ryzen 5 1400
MSRP: $169|Avg: $91
96%
#450
Celeron G1850
MSRP: $42|Avg: $30
95%
#451
Celeron G3900T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $70
95%
#453
Phenom X4 9100e
MSRP: $200|Avg: $35
95%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Celeron 5205U

#1218
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
8811%
#1219
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
8682%
#1220
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
7970%
#1221
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
7934%
#1222
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
7861%
#1224
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
7592%
#1225
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
7279%
#1226
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
7267%
#1227
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
7072%
#1230
Core i7-820QM
MSRP: $546|Avg: N/A
100%
#1231
Celeron 5205U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#1232
Core Duo T2700
MSRP: $663|Avg: N/A
84%
#1234
Pentium SU4100
MSRP: $289|Avg: $15
71%
#1235
Core Solo T1400
MSRP: $200|Avg: $5
64%
#1236
Core i7-940XM
MSRP: $1096|Avg: N/A
62%
#1237
Core Solo T1350
MSRP: $200|Avg: $70
61%
#1239
Core Solo T1300
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
55%
#1240
Core Solo T1200
MSRP: $209|Avg: $10
51%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Celeron 5205U (2019) utilizes 14 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPhenom X4 9150eCeleron 5205U
Gaming
Lower gaming performance
Superior gaming performance
Workstation
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Better multi-core power
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm)
✨ Modern (Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The Phenom X4 9150e (2008) relies on 65 nm technology and older memory, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPhenom X4 9150eCeleron 5205U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom X4 9150e and Celeron 5205U

AMD

Phenom X4 9150e

The Phenom X4 9150e is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 1.8 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,427 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Celeron 5205U

The Celeron 5205U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 31 October 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.9 GHz, with boost up to 1.9 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1528. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 1,432 points. Launch price was $107.

Processing Power

The Phenom X4 9150e packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Celeron 5205U offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Phenom X4 9150e has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 1.8 GHz on the Phenom X4 9150e versus 1.9 GHz on the Celeron 5205U — a 5.4% clock advantage for the Celeron 5205U. The Phenom X4 9150e uses the Agena (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Celeron 5205U uses Comet Lake-U (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom X4 9150e scores 1,427 against the Celeron 5205U's 1,432 — a 0.3% lead for the Celeron 5205U. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9150e vs 2 MB on the Celeron 5205U.

FeaturePhenom X4 9150eCeleron 5205U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
1.8 GHz
1.9 GHz+6%
Base Clock
1.9 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
1 MB+100%
Process
65 nm
14 nm-78%
Architecture
Agena (2007−2008)
Comet Lake-U (2019−2020)
PassMark
1,427
1,432
Geekbench 6 Single
385
Geekbench 6 Multi
650
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom X4 9150e uses the AM2+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Celeron 5205U uses FCBGA1528 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom X4 9150eCeleron 5205U
Socket
AM2+
FCBGA1528
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0
PCIe 3.0+50%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2400
Max RAM Capacity
64 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Phenom X4 9150e) / VT-x, VT-d (Celeron 5205U). The Celeron 5205U includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)), while the Phenom X4 9150e requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Celeron 5205U targets Budget. Direct competitor: Celeron 5205U rivals Pentium Gold 6405U.

FeaturePhenom X4 9150eCeleron 5205U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics (Comet Lake)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Budget