Phenom X4 9550
VS
Core 2 Duo T5500

Phenom X4 9550 vs Core 2 Duo T5500

AMD

Phenom X4 9550

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.2 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Core 2 Duo T5500

2 Cores2 Thrd2 WWMax: 1.66 GHz2007

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Phenom X4 9550 is positioned at rank 382 and the Core 2 Duo T5500 is on rank 386, so the Phenom X4 9550 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Phenom X4 9550

#1
Ryzen 9 7950X
MSRP: $194|Avg: $20
5609%
#2
Core i9-10900T
MSRP: $120|Avg: $5
5300%
#3
Ryzen 3 PRO 4355GE
MSRP: $423|Avg: $5
3848%
#4
Ryzen Threadripper 3960X
MSRP: $1399|Avg: $85
1159%
#5
Ryzen 9 9950X
MSRP: $649|Avg: $129
918%
#6
Ryzen 5 8400F
MSRP: $303|Avg: $55
803%
#7
Ryzen 7 PRO 2700
MSRP: $299|Avg: $60
460%
#8
Ryzen 5 2600X
MSRP: $229|Avg: $55
454%
#9
Ryzen 3 PRO 5350G
MSRP: $150|Avg: $60
413%
#10
Core Ultra 5 245KF
MSRP: $294|Avg: $189
413%
#11
Ryzen 5 5500
MSRP: $159|Avg: $85
409%
#12
Ryzen 5 3600
MSRP: $199|Avg: $80
398%
#13
Core i3-9100E
MSRP: $202|Avg: $30
392%
#14
Core Ultra 5 245K
MSRP: $319|Avg: $200
391%
#15
Core i3-8300T
MSRP: $138|Avg: $25
387%
#328
Core i9-9900KS
MSRP: $513|Avg: $350
100%
#329
Core i5-11600T
MSRP: $262|Avg: $262
99%
#330
Core i9-9900K
MSRP: $488|Avg: $331
98%
#331
Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
MSRP: $899|Avg: $540
98%
#332
Celeron G4930T
MSRP: $42|Avg: $42
98%
#333
Core i9-9920X
MSRP: $1189|Avg: $464
97%
#382
Phenom X4 9550
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#385
Pentium G4560
MSRP: $64|Avg: $85
99%
#392
A10-7860K
MSRP: $117|Avg: N/A
97%
#393
Athlon X4 845
MSRP: $70|Avg: $15
97%
#395
Celeron G3930
MSRP: $42|Avg: $25
97%
#396
Ryzen 3 1300X
MSRP: $129|Avg: $54
97%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core 2 Duo T5500

#119
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
MSRP: $400|Avg: $380
98%
#374
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
530%
#375
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
523%
#376
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
480%
#377
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
477%
#378
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
473%
#380
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
457%
#381
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
438%
#382
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
437%
#383
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
426%
#386
Core 2 Duo T5500
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
#391
Core i5-1145GRE
MSRP: $362|Avg: N/A
99%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Phenom X4 9550 delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core 2 Duo T5500 in both compute-intensive tasks (0.4% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPhenom X4 9550Core 2 Duo T5500
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Agena (2007−2008) / 65 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Merom (2006−2008) / 65 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPhenom X4 9550Core 2 Duo T5500
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Phenom X4 9550 and Core 2 Duo T5500

AMD

Phenom X4 9550

The Phenom X4 9550 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.2 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,667 points. Launch price was $149.

Intel

Core 2 Duo T5500

The Core 2 Duo T5500 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2008-01-01. It is based on the Merom (2006−2008) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1.66 GHz, with boost up to 1.66 GHz. L3 cache: 0 kB. L2 cache: 2 MB. Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: PGA478. Thermal design power (TDP): 34 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,660 points. Launch price was $249.

Processing Power

The Phenom X4 9550 packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core 2 Duo T5500 offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Phenom X4 9550 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 2.2 GHz on the Phenom X4 9550 versus 1.66 GHz on the Core 2 Duo T5500 — a 28% clock advantage for the Phenom X4 9550. The Phenom X4 9550 uses the Agena (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Core 2 Duo T5500 uses Merom (2006−2008) (65 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom X4 9550 scores 1,667 against the Core 2 Duo T5500's 1,660 — a 0.4% lead for the Phenom X4 9550. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9550 vs 0 kB on the Core 2 Duo T5500.

FeaturePhenom X4 9550Core 2 Duo T5500
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
2.2 GHz+33%
1.66 GHz
Base Clock
1.66 GHz
L3 Cache
2 MB (total)
0 kB
L2 Cache
512 kB (per core)
2 MB+300%
Process
65 nm
65 nm
Architecture
Agena (2007−2008)
Merom (2006−2008)
PassMark
1,667
1,660
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Phenom X4 9550 uses the AM2+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Core 2 Duo T5500 uses PGA478 (PCIe 1.1) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePhenom X4 9550Core 2 Duo T5500
Socket
AM2+
PGA478
PCIe Generation
PCIe 2.0+82%
PCIe 1.1