Phenom X4 9850B vs Xeon E5603

AMD

Phenom X4 9850B

4 Cores4 Thrd95 WWMax: 2.5 GHz2008
VS
Intel

Xeon E5603

4 Cores4 Thrd80 WWMax: 1.6 GHz2011
Similar parts
·······

Phenom X4 9850B vs Xeon E5603 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Phenom X4 9850B vs Xeon E5603 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Phenom X4 9850B vs Xeon E5603: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Phenom X4 9850B

2008

Why buy it

    Trade-offs

    • Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 4 MB).
    • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5603, which brings 4 cores / 4 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
    • 18.8% higher power demand at 95W vs 80W.

    Xeon E5603

    2011

    Why buy it

    • +100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB).
    • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 4 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 0.
    • Draws 80W instead of 95W, a 15W reduction.
    • 100+% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

    Trade-offs

    • Lower PassMark (1,935 vs 1,946).
    • Launch MSRP is still $188 MSRP, while Phenom X4 9850B mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

    Quick Answers

    So, is Phenom X4 9850B better than Xeon E5603?
    Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5603 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Phenom X4 9850B is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
    Which one is better for gaming?
    If gaming is the priority, Phenom X4 9850B is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
    Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
    For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Phenom X4 9850B is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.
    Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
    Phenom X4 9850B is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5603 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Phenom X4 9850B comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $188 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5603 is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (10.3 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
    Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
    Xeon E5603 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2011 vs 2008) and 100% larger total L3 cache (4 MB vs 2 MB). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

    Phenom X4 9850B vs Xeon E5603 Technical Specifications

    Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

    AMD

    Phenom X4 9850B

    The Phenom X4 9850B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2009-01-01. It is based on the Agena (2007−2008) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Max frequency: 2.5 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 65 nm process technology. Socket: AM2+. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Passmark benchmark score: 1,946 points. Launch price was $149.

    Intel

    Xeon E5603

    The Xeon E5603 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 14 February 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the Westmere-EP (2010−2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.6 GHz, with boost up to 1.6 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 32 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1366. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,935 points. Launch price was $286.

    Processing Power

    Both the Phenom X4 9850B and Xeon E5603 share an identical 4-core/4-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 2.5 GHz on the Phenom X4 9850B versus 1.6 GHz on the Xeon E5603 — a 43.9% clock advantage for the Phenom X4 9850B. The Phenom X4 9850B uses the Agena (2007−2008) architecture (65 nm), while the Xeon E5603 uses Westmere-EP (2010−2011) (32 nm). In PassMark, the Phenom X4 9850B scores 1,946 against the Xeon E5603's 1,935 — a 0.6% lead for the Phenom X4 9850B. L3 cache: 2 MB (total) on the Phenom X4 9850B vs 4 MB (total) on the Xeon E5603.

    FeaturePhenom X4 9850BXeon E5603
    Cores / Threads
    4 / 4
    4 / 4
    Boost Clock
    2.5 GHz+56%
    1.6 GHz
    Base Clock
    1.6 GHz
    L3 Cache
    2 MB (total)
    4 MB (total)+100%
    L2 Cache
    512 kB (per core)+100%
    256 kB (per core)
    Process
    65 nm
    32 nm-51%
    Architecture
    Agena (2007−2008)
    Westmere-EP (2010−2011)
    PassMark
    1,946
    1,935
    🧠

    Memory & Platform

    The Phenom X4 9850B uses the AM2+ socket (PCIe 2.0), while the Xeon E5603 uses LGA1366 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

    FeaturePhenom X4 9850BXeon E5603
    Socket
    AM2+
    LGA1366
    PCIe Generation
    PCIe 2.0
    PCIe 2.0
    Max RAM Speed
    DDR3-1066
    Max RAM Capacity
    288 GB
    RAM Channels
    3
    ECC Support
    Yes
    PCIe Lanes
    32
    🔧

    Advanced Features

    Virtualization: not specified (Phenom X4 9850B) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E5603). Primary use case: Xeon E5603 targets Server.

    FeaturePhenom X4 9850BXeon E5603
    Integrated GPU
    No
    Unlocked
    No
    AVX-512
    No
    Virtualization
    VT-x, VT-d
    Target Use
    Server