Pro A10-8700B vs Atom x7211RE
Pro A10-8700B
Atom x7211RE
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pro A10-8700B is positioned at rank 519 and the Atom x7211RE is on rank 515, so the Atom x7211RE offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Pro A10-8700B
Performance Per Dollar Atom x7211RE
Performance Comparison
About PassMark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
| Insight | Pro A10-8700B | Atom x7211RE |
|---|---|---|
| Gaming | Balanced gaming performance | Balanced gaming performance |
| Workstation | ❌ Weaker in multi-core tasks | ✅ Better multi-core power |
| Price | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
| Longevity | 🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm) | ✨ Modern (Amston Lake (2024−2025) / 10 nm) |
💎 Value Proposition
| Insight | Pro A10-8700B | Atom x7211RE |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency | ❌ Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | Equivalent pricing | Equivalent pricing |
Performance Check
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Pro A10-8700B and Atom x7211RE
Pro A10-8700B
The Pro A10-8700B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,170 points. Launch price was $69.
Atom x7211RE
The Atom x7211RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,188 points. Launch price was $42.
Processing Power
The Pro A10-8700B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom x7211RE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the Pro A10-8700B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Pro A10-8700B versus 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211RE — identical boost frequencies (base: 1.8 GHz vs 1 GHz). The Pro A10-8700B uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Atom x7211RE uses Amston Lake (2024−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Pro A10-8700B scores 2,170 against the Atom x7211RE's 2,188 — a 0.8% lead for the Atom x7211RE.
| Feature | Pro A10-8700B | Atom x7211RE |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 4+100% | 2 / 2 |
| Boost Clock | 3.2 GHz | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 1.8 GHz+80% | 1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | — | 6 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 2048 kB | 2 MB (total) |
| Process | 28 nm | 10 nm-64% |
| Architecture | Carrizo (2015−2018) | Amston Lake (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 2,170 | 2,188 |
Memory & Platform
The Pro A10-8700B uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom x7211RE uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Pro A10-8700B | Atom x7211RE |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP4 | FCBGA1264 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | LPDDR5-4800 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 1 |
| ECC Support | — | ✅ |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Pro A10-8700B) / VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7211RE). The Atom x7211RE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (16 EU)), while the Pro A10-8700B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom x7211RE targets Embedded.
| Feature | Pro A10-8700B | Atom x7211RE |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics (16 EU) |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Embedded |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Pro A10-8700B and Atom x7211RE
