Pro A10-8700B
VS
Core i3-5010U

Pro A10-8700B vs Core i3-5010U

AMD

Pro A10-8700B

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2015
VS
Intel

Core i3-5010U

2 Cores4 Thrd512 WWMax: 2.1 GHz2015

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Pro A10-8700B is positioned at rank 519 and the Core i3-5010U is on rank 521, so the Pro A10-8700B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Pro A10-8700B

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
97%
#507
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
676%
#508
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
666%
#509
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
612%
#510
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
609%
#511
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
603%
#513
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
582%
#514
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
559%
#515
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
558%
#516
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
543%
#519
Pro A10-8700B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Core i3-5010U

#167
Core Ultra 7 258V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
98%
#509
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
680%
#510
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
670%
#511
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
615%
#512
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
612%
#513
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
607%
#515
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
586%
#516
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
562%
#517
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
561%
#518
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
546%
#521
Core i3-5010U
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Performance Leadership: The Pro A10-8700B delivers superior performance across the board. It outperforms the Core i3-5010U in both compute-intensive tasks (0.6% faster) and gaming workloads.
InsightPro A10-8700BCore i3-5010U
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Carrizo (2015−2018) / 28 nm)
🛑 Legacy (Broadwell-U (2015) / 14 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

InsightPro A10-8700BCore i3-5010U
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Pro A10-8700B and Core i3-5010U

AMD

Pro A10-8700B

The Pro A10-8700B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 June 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3/DDR3L-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 2,170 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Core i3-5010U

The Core i3-5010U is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 1 March 2015 (10 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell-U (2015) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 2.1 GHz. L3 cache: 3 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1168. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 2,157 points. Launch price was $281.

Processing Power

The Pro A10-8700B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Core i3-5010U offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Pro A10-8700B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.2 GHz on the Pro A10-8700B versus 2.1 GHz on the Core i3-5010U — a 41.5% clock advantage for the Pro A10-8700B (base: 1.8 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Pro A10-8700B uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the Core i3-5010U uses Broadwell-U (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Pro A10-8700B scores 2,170 against the Core i3-5010U's 2,157 — a 0.6% lead for the Pro A10-8700B.

FeaturePro A10-8700BCore i3-5010U
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
3.2 GHz+52%
2.1 GHz
Base Clock
1.8 GHz
2.1 GHz+17%
L3 Cache
3 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB+700%
256K (per core)
Process
28 nm
14 nm-50%
Architecture
Carrizo (2015−2018)
Broadwell-U (2015)
PassMark
2,170
2,157
Geekbench 6 Single
737
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Pro A10-8700B uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i3-5010U uses FCBGA1168 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePro A10-8700BCore i3-5010U
Socket
FP4
FCBGA1168
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR3L-1600
Max RAM Capacity
16 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
12
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Pro A10-8700B) / VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Core i3-5010U). The Core i3-5010U includes integrated graphics (HD Graphics 5500), while the Pro A10-8700B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i3-5010U targets Mainstream Laptop. Direct competitor: Core i3-5010U rivals A10-8700P.

FeaturePro A10-8700BCore i3-5010U
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
HD Graphics 5500
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use
Mainstream Laptop