PRO A6-8570E vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

PRO A6-8570E vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 Performance Spectrum

PRO A6-8570E

2 / 2

1,606

0.0%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5945WX

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7955WX

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

4 / 4

1,615

+0.6%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

PRO A6-8570E vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

PRO A6-8570E vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

PRO A6-8570E

2018

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (1,606 vs 1,615).
❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

2011

Why buy it

✅+0.6% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 better than PRO A6-8570E?

It depends on what you want from the system. For gaming, PRO A6-8570E is ahead with a 1.4% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 pulls ahead with 0.6% better PassMark.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.6% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 4 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 still makes the most sense overall. VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 0.6% better PassMark. That said, if you already own a compatible AM4 + DDR4 setup, PRO A6-8570E can still make sense as a platform-matched option because it avoids a motherboard and RAM swap.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

PRO A6-8570E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2011). That makes it the safer long-term bet.

PRO A6-8570E vs VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

PRO A6-8570E

The PRO A6-8570E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Outubro 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.4 GHz. L2 cache: 1024 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 1,606 points. Launch price was $69.

VIA Nano QuadCore L4700

The VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 is manufactured by TSMC. It was released in 12 May 2011 (14 years ago). It is based on the CNQ (2011) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 1.2 GHz, with boost up to 1.47 GHz. L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 40 nm process technology. Socket: NanoBGA2. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR3. Passmark benchmark score: 1,615 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Processing Power

The PRO A6-8570E packs 2 cores / 2 threads, while the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 offers 4 cores / 4 threads — the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.4 GHz on the PRO A6-8570E versus 1.47 GHz on the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 — a 79.3% clock advantage for the PRO A6-8570E (base: 3 GHz vs 1.2 GHz). The PRO A6-8570E uses the Carrizo (2015−2018) architecture (28 nm), while the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 uses CNQ (2011) (40 nm). In PassMark, the PRO A6-8570E scores 1,606 against the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700's 1,615 — a 0.6% lead for the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700.

Feature	PRO A6-8570E	VIA Nano QuadCore L4700
Cores / Threads	2 / 2	4 / 4+100%
Boost Clock	3.4 GHz+131%	1.47 GHz
Base Clock	3 GHz+150%	1.2 GHz
L2 Cache	1024 kB	1 MB (per core)
Process	28 nm-30%	40 nm
Architecture	Carrizo (2015−2018)	CNQ (2011)
PassMark	1,606	1,615

🧠

Memory & Platform

The PRO A6-8570E uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the VIA Nano QuadCore L4700 uses NanoBGA2 (PCIe 2.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.