PRO A8-9600B
VS
Atom x7211RE

PRO A8-9600B vs Atom x7211RE

AMD

PRO A8-9600B

4 Cores4 Thrd2 WWMax: 3.3 GHz2016
VS
Intel

Atom x7211RE

2 Cores2 Thrd6 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2024

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (PassMark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The PRO A8-9600B is positioned at rank 508 and the Atom x7211RE is on rank 515, so the PRO A8-9600B offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar PRO A8-9600B

#161
Core Ultra 7 268V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $400
100%
#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
99%
#496
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
668%
#497
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
659%
#498
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
605%
#499
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
602%
#500
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
596%
#502
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
576%
#503
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
552%
#504
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
551%
#505
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
536%
#508
PRO A8-9600B
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Per Dollar Atom x7211RE

#162
Core Ultra 7 256V
MSRP: $450|Avg: $350
99%
#503
Atom x5-Z8300
MSRP: $20|Avg: N/A
670%
#504
Atom Z3735G
MSRP: $17|Avg: N/A
661%
#505
Core i5-480M
MSRP: $81|Avg: $77
606%
#506
Core i5-460M
MSRP: $80|Avg: $129
604%
#507
Core i5-2540M
MSRP: $266|Avg: $10
598%
#509
Core i5-450M
MSRP: $32|Avg: $31
578%
#510
Core i3-380M
MSRP: $49|Avg: $25
554%
#511
Core i5-430M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $33
553%
#512
Core 2 Duo T6600
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $4
538%
#515
Atom x7211RE
MSRP: N/A|Avg: N/A
100%
Based on actual market prices and performance synthetic scores.

Performance Comparison

About PassMark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

Generational Difference: This comparison involves processors from different technological eras. The Atom x7211RE (2024) utilizes 10 nm technology and DDR4, DDR5, providing a fundamental performance advantage.
InsightPRO A8-9600BAtom x7211RE
Gaming
Superior gaming performance
Lower gaming performance
Workstation
Better multi-core power
Weaker in multi-core tasks
Price
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing
Longevity
🛑 Legacy (Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) / 28 nm)
✨ Modern (Amston Lake (2024−2025) / 10 nm)

💎 Value Proposition

The PRO A8-9600B (2016) relies on 28 nm technology and DDR3, DDR4, placing it in a different performance category relative to modern standards.
InsightPRO A8-9600BAtom x7211RE
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost
Equivalent pricing
Equivalent pricing

Performance Check

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of PRO A8-9600B and Atom x7211RE

AMD

PRO A8-9600B

The PRO A8-9600B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L2 cache: 2048 kB. Built on 28 nm process technology. Socket: FP4. Thermal design power (TDP): 2 MB. Memory support: DDR3, DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 2,195 points. Launch price was $69.

Intel

Atom x7211RE

The Atom x7211RE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 8 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Amston Lake (2024−2025) architecture. It features 2 cores and 2 threads. Base frequency is 1 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (total). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA1264. Thermal design power (TDP): 6 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 2,188 points. Launch price was $42.

Processing Power

The PRO A8-9600B packs 4 cores / 4 threads, while the Atom x7211RE offers 2 cores / 2 threads — the PRO A8-9600B has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 3.3 GHz on the PRO A8-9600B versus 3.2 GHz on the Atom x7211RE — a 3.1% clock advantage for the PRO A8-9600B (base: 2.4 GHz vs 1 GHz). The PRO A8-9600B uses the Bristol Ridge (2016−2019) architecture (28 nm), while the Atom x7211RE uses Amston Lake (2024−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the PRO A8-9600B scores 2,195 against the Atom x7211RE's 2,188 — a 0.3% lead for the PRO A8-9600B.

FeaturePRO A8-9600BAtom x7211RE
Cores / Threads
4 / 4+100%
2 / 2
Boost Clock
3.3 GHz+3%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
2.4 GHz+140%
1 GHz
L3 Cache
6 MB (total)
L2 Cache
2048 kB
2 MB (total)
Process
28 nm
10 nm-64%
Architecture
Bristol Ridge (2016−2019)
Amston Lake (2024−2025)
PassMark
2,195
2,188
🧠

Memory & Platform

The PRO A8-9600B uses the FP4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Atom x7211RE uses FCBGA1264 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeaturePRO A8-9600BAtom x7211RE
Socket
FP4
FCBGA1264
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
LPDDR5-4800
Max RAM Capacity
32 GB
RAM Channels
1
ECC Support
PCIe Lanes
8
🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (PRO A8-9600B) / VT-x, VT-d (Atom x7211RE). The Atom x7211RE includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics (16 EU)), while the PRO A8-9600B requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Atom x7211RE targets Embedded.

FeaturePRO A8-9600BAtom x7211RE
Integrated GPU
Yes
IGPU Model
UHD Graphics (16 EU)
Unlocked
No
AVX-512
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
Target Use
Embedded