Quadro 500M vs Radeon R7 M265

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro 500M vs Radeon R7 M265 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro 500M vs Radeon R7 M265: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro 500M

2010

Why buy it

✅Draws 100W instead of 150W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon R7 M265 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 1 GB vs 4 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2010 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.3 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $130 MSRP).

Radeon R7 M265

2014

Why buy it

✅6.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.3 vs 0 G3D/$ ($130 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (4 GB vs 1 GB).

Trade-offs

❌2014 hardware with 4 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌50% higher power demand at 150W vs 100W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon R7 M265 is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 6.5% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro 500M instead at 571 vs 560, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Quadro 500M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond because it comes out ahead on the available hardware-headroom signals for this matchup.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R7 M265 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R7 M265 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro 500M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro 500M vs Radeon R7 M265 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro 500M

The Quadro 500M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 27 2010. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 405 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 571 points.

Radeon R7 M265

The Radeon R7 M265 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 13 2014. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 925 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 560 points. Launch price was $149.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Quadro 500M scores 571 and the Radeon R7 M265 reaches 560 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro 500M is built on Fermi while the Radeon R7 M265 uses GCN 1.0, both on 40 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 320 (Quadro 500M) vs 1,024 (Radeon R7 M265). Raw compute: 0.5184 TFLOPS (Quadro 500M) vs 1.894 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M265).

Feature	Quadro 500M	Radeon R7 M265
G3D Mark Score	571+2%	560
Architecture	Fermi	GCN 1.0
Process Node	40 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	320	1024+220%
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.5184 TFLOPS	1.894 TFLOPS+265%
ROPs	32	32
TMUs	40	64+60%
L1 Cache	640 KB+150%	256 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Quadro 500M	Radeon R7 M265
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro 500M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M265 carries 4 GB. Radeon R7 M265 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro 500M and 128-bit on the Radeon R7 M265.

Feature	Quadro 500M	Radeon R7 M265
VRAM Capacity	1 GB	4 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	512 KB	512 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro 500M draws 100W versus the Radeon R7 M265's 150W — a 40% difference. The Quadro 500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro 500M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M265). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Quadro 500M	Radeon R7 M265
TDP	100W-33%	150W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Slots	—	0
Temp (Load)	—	80°C
Perf/Watt	5.7+54%	3.7

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R7 M265 (2014 vs 2010).

Feature	Quadro 500M	Radeon R7 M265
MSRP	—	$130
Codename	GF100	Pitcairn
Release	July 27 2010	February 13 2014
Ranking	#675	#489

Search Quadro 500M on Amazon

Search Radeon R7 M265 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.