Quadro FX 3800M vs Radeon HD 6610M

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3800M

2008Core: 610 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon HD 6610M

2011Core: 680 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Quadro FX 3800M vs Radeon HD 6610M Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Quadro FX 3800M vs Radeon HD 6610M FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Quadro FX 3800M vs Radeon HD 6610M: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Quadro FX 3800M

2008

Why buy it

  • 100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 6610M across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 152% higher power demand at 189W vs 75W.

Radeon HD 6610M

2011

Why buy it

  • 11.0% more average FPS across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Draws 75W instead of 189W, a 114W reduction.
  • More future proof: TeraScale 2 (2009−2015) on 40nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 2011 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon HD 6610M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 11.0% in average FPS across 22 tracked games in our benchmark data. PassMark G3D leans toward Quadro FX 3800M instead at 572 vs 565, so for this question the real-game FPS result matters more than the synthetic split.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Quadro FX 3800M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon HD 6610M makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon HD 6610M is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Quadro FX 3800M has the stronger long-term case.

Quadro FX 3800M vs Radeon HD 6610M Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

NVIDIA

Quadro FX 3800M

The Quadro FX 3800M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 572 points. Launch price was $3,499.

AMD

Radeon HD 6610M

The Radeon HD 6610M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 680 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 565 points.

Graphics Performance

The Quadro FX 3800M scores 572 and the Radeon HD 6610M reaches 565 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3800M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon HD 6610M uses TeraScale 2, both on 55 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3800M) vs 960 (Radeon HD 6610M). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3800M) vs 1.306 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 6610M).

FeatureQuadro FX 3800MRadeon HD 6610M
G3D Mark Score
572+1%
565
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TeraScale 2
Process Node
55 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
240
960+300%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.6221 TFLOPS
1.306 TFLOPS+110%
ROPs
32
32
TMUs
80+67%
48
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureQuadro FX 3800MRadeon HD 6610M
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Quadro FX 3800M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 6610M carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 3800M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3800M and System on the Radeon HD 6610M. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Quadro FX 3800M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 6610M) — the Radeon HD 6610M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureQuadro FX 3800MRadeon HD 6610M
VRAM Capacity
1 GB+100%
0.5 GB
Memory Type
GDDR5
Shared
Bus Width
64-bit
System
L2 Cache
256 KB
512 KB+100%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Quadro FX 3800M draws 189W versus the Radeon HD 6610M's 75W — a 86.4% difference. The Radeon HD 6610M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3800M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 6610M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 1x 6-pin.

FeatureQuadro FX 3800MRadeon HD 6610M
TDP
189W
75W-60%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
1x 6-pin
Length
0mm
Height
0mm
Slots
0
Temp (Load)
90
Perf/Watt
3.0
7.5+150%