
Quadro FX 3800M

Radeon R7E
Quadro FX 3800M vs Radeon R7E Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Quadro FX 3800M vs Radeon R7E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Quadro FX 3800M vs Radeon R7E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Quadro FX 3800M
2008Why buy it
- ✅45.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌2008 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌243.6% higher power demand at 189W vs 55W.
Radeon R7E
2013Why buy it
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 189W, a 134W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: GCN 1.0 (2012−2020) on 28nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro FX 3800M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Quadro FX 3800M vs Radeon R7E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Quadro FX 3800M
The Quadro FX 3800M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 11 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 610 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 189W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 572 points. Launch price was $3,499.

Radeon R7E
The Radeon R7E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 20 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $109.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro FX 3800M scores 572 and the Radeon R7E reaches 565 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro FX 3800M is built on Tesla 2.0 while the Radeon R7E uses GCN 1.0, both on 55 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 240 (Quadro FX 3800M) vs 512 (Radeon R7E). Raw compute: 0.6221 TFLOPS (Quadro FX 3800M) vs 0.8192 TFLOPS (Radeon R7E).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800M | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 572+1% | 565 |
| Architecture | Tesla 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 55 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 240 | 512+113% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.6221 TFLOPS | 0.8192 TFLOPS+32% |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+150% | 32 |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800M | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro FX 3800M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7E carries 512 MB. Quadro FX 3800M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is 64-bit on the Quadro FX 3800M and 64-bit on the Radeon R7E.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800M | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 1 GB+100% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 10 (Quadro FX 3800M) vs 12_0 (Radeon R7E). Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800M | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 10 | 12_0+20% |
| Max Displays | 2 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: None (Quadro FX 3800M) vs VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7E). Decoder: PureVideo HD (VP2) vs UVD 4.2.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800M | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | None | VCE 2.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD (VP2) | UVD 4.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 | — |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro FX 3800M draws 189W versus the Radeon R7E's 55W — a 109.8% difference. The Radeon R7E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro FX 3800M) vs 350W (Radeon R7E). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Card length: 0mm vs 1mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots.
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800M | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 189W | 55W-71% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | 0mm | 1mm |
| Height | 0mm | — |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 90 | — |
| Perf/Watt | 3.0 | 10.3+243% |
Value Analysis
The newer card here is Radeon R7E (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Quadro FX 3800M | Radeon R7E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $0 |
| Codename | GT200B | Cape Verde |
| Release | November 11 2008 | December 20 2013 |
| Ranking | #815 | #738 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














