
Quadro K1100M
Popular choices:

GeForce 920MX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Quadro K1100M is positioned at rank 109 and the GeForce 920MX is on rank 360, so the Quadro K1100M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Quadro K1100M
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 920MX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Quadro K1100M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.3% higher G3D Mark score and 300% more VRAM (2 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce 920MX.
| Insight | Quadro K1100M | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Quadro K1100M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Quadro K1100M and GeForce 920MX

Quadro K1100M
The Quadro K1100M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 23 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 706 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,089 points. Launch price was $109.94.

GeForce 920MX
The GeForce 920MX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 25 2016. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 965 MHz to 993 MHz. It has 256 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 16W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,064 points.
Graphics Performance
The Quadro K1100M scores 1,089 and the GeForce 920MX reaches 1,064 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Quadro K1100M is built on Kepler while the GeForce 920MX uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 384 (Quadro K1100M) vs 256 (GeForce 920MX). Raw compute: 0.5422 TFLOPS (Quadro K1100M) vs 0.5084 TFLOPS (GeForce 920MX).
| Feature | Quadro K1100M | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,089+2% | 1,064 |
| Architecture | Kepler | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384+50% | 256 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.5422 TFLOPS+7% | 0.5084 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 32+33% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 32 KB | 128 KB+300% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Quadro K1100M | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Quadro K1100M comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce 920MX has 512 MB. The Quadro K1100M offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Quadro K1100M) vs 1 MB (GeForce 920MX) — the GeForce 920MX has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Quadro K1100M | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB+300% | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 0.25 MB | 1 MB+300% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (11_0) (Quadro K1100M) vs 12 (11_0) (GeForce 920MX). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Quadro K1100M | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (11_0) | 12 (11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.2+9% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: 1st Gen NVENC (Quadro K1100M) vs None (GeForce 920MX). Decoder: 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (Quadro K1100M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (GeForce 920MX).
| Feature | Quadro K1100M | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | 1st Gen NVENC | None |
| Decoder | 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5) | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Quadro K1100M draws 45W versus the GeForce 920MX's 16W — a 95.1% difference. The GeForce 920MX is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Quadro K1100M) vs 350W (GeForce 920MX). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Quadro K1100M | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 45W | 16W-64% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Slots | 0 | — |
| Temp (Load) | 70°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 24.2 | 66.5+175% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce 920MX is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2013).
| Feature | Quadro K1100M | GeForce 920MX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $54 |
| Codename | GK107 | GM108 |
| Release | July 23 2013 | March 25 2016 |
| Ranking | #856 | #864 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.

















