Radeon 6600M vs Radeon R5 330

AMD

Radeon 6600M

2023Core: 1500 MHzBoost: 1900 MHz
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

Radeon R5 330

2017Core: 730 MHzBoost: 1024 MHz
Similar parts
·······

Radeon 6600M vs Radeon R5 330 Performance Spectrum

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon 6600M vs Radeon R5 330 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon 6600M vs Radeon R5 330: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon 6600M

2023

Why buy it

  • 47.0% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Better long-term bet: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
  • Draws 40W instead of 50W, a 10W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 2 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 6.5 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $81 MSRP).

Radeon R5 330

2017

Why buy it

  • Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 6.5 vs 0 G3D/$ ($81 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
  • 300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (2 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Radeon 6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 2017 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
  • 25% higher power demand at 50W vs 40W.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Radeon 6600M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 47.0% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 2.5% in PassMark G3D (536 vs 523), so the answer here is pretty clean.
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Radeon 6600M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: a 6nm process instead of 28nm, 6 vs 0 ray-tracing units, and a newer 2023 generation instead of 2017. That gives it the more rounded hardware package for newer games.
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon R5 330 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 330 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon 6600M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon 6600M vs Radeon R5 330 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Radeon 6600M

The Radeon 6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 536 points.

AMD

Radeon R5 330

The Radeon R5 330 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 18 2017. It features the GCN 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 730 MHz to 1024 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 523 points.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon 6600M scores 536 and the Radeon R5 330 reaches 523 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R5 330 uses GCN 3.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 6600M) vs 384 (Radeon R5 330). Raw compute: 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 6600M) vs 0.7864 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 330). Boost clocks: 1900 MHz vs 1024 MHz.

FeatureRadeon 6600MRadeon R5 330
G3D Mark Score
536+2%
523
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
GCN 3.0
Process Node
6 nm
28 nm
Shading Units
384
384
Compute (TFLOPS)
1.459 TFLOPS+86%
0.7864 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1900 MHz+86%
1024 MHz
ROPs
16+100%
8
TMUs
24
24
L1 Cache
128 KB+33%
96 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB+1438%
0.13 MB
Frame Generation
FSR upscaling + RSR
FSR upscaling

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon 6600MRadeon R5 330
Upscaling Tech
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon 6600M has 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 330 carries 2 GB. Radeon R5 330 gives you 300% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon 6600M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 330. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 6600M) vs 0.13 MB (Radeon R5 330) — the Radeon 6600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon 6600MRadeon R5 330
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
2 GB+300%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
System
Unknown
Bus Width
System
128-bit
L2 Cache
2 MB+1438%
0.13 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon 6600M draws 40W versus the Radeon R5 330's 50W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon 6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 6600M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 330). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRadeon 6600MRadeon R5 330
TDP
40W-20%
50W
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
168mm
Height
69mm
Slots
1
Perf/Watt
13.4+28%
10.5
💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon 6600M (2023 vs 2017).

FeatureRadeon 6600MRadeon R5 330
MSRP
$81
Codename
Rembrandt+
Weston
Release
January 3 2023
April 18 2017
Ranking
#565
#873

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.