Radeon 6600M vs Radeon R7 M260
Radeon 6600M
Popular choices:
Radeon R7 M260
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon 6600M is positioned at rank 587 and the Radeon R7 M260 is on rank 486, so the Radeon R7 M260 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 6600M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 M260
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon 6600M is significantly newer (2023 vs 2015). The Radeon 6600M likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon R7 M260 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 6600M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon R7 M260 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 6600M | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon 6600M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 6600M and Radeon R7 M260
Radeon 6600M
The Radeon 6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 6 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 536 points.
Radeon R7 M260
The Radeon R7 M260 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 6 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 620 MHz to 715 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 527 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 6600M scores 536 and the Radeon R7 M260 reaches 527 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 6600M is built on RDNA 2.0 while the Radeon R7 M260 uses GCN 1.0, both on 6 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon 6600M) vs 384 (Radeon R7 M260). Raw compute: 1.459 TFLOPS (Radeon 6600M) vs 0.5491 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 M260). Boost clocks: 1900 MHz vs 715 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon 6600M | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 536+2% | 527 |
| Architecture | RDNA 2.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 384 | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.459 TFLOPS+166% | 0.5491 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1900 MHz+166% | 715 MHz |
| ROPs | 16+100% | 8 |
| TMUs | 24 | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+33% | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 6600M | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 6600M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon R7 M260 has 4 GB. The Radeon R7 M260 offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon 6600M) vs 0.25 MB (Radeon R7 M260) — the Radeon 6600M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 6600M | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+700% | 0.25 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 6600M draws 40W versus the Radeon R7 M260's 75W — a 60.9% difference. The Radeon 6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon 6600M) vs 350W (Radeon R7 M260). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon 6600M | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-47% | 75W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 13.4+91% | 7.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 6600M is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2015).
| Feature | Radeon 6600M | Radeon R7 M260 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $110 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $110 |
| Codename | Rembrandt+ | Opal |
| Release | January 3 2023 | December 6 2015 |
| Ranking | #565 | #878 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 6600M and Radeon R7 M260
