Radeon 8060S vs Radeon Pro W6900X
Radeon 8060S
Popular choices:
Radeon Pro W6900X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon 8060S
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W6900X
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon 8060S is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon Pro W6900X offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.3%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.5 / 4nm) | 🔮Strong Longevity (RDNA 2.0 / 7nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ⚠️ Potential Buffer Bottleneck | 🎮 High Capacity (32 GB) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon 8060S offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $800 versus $5,000 for the Radeon Pro W6900X, it costs 84% less. While it maintains competitive performance, this results in a 545.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+545.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($800) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,000) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon 8060S and Radeon Pro W6900X
Radeon 8060S
The Radeon 8060S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,989 points.
Radeon Pro W6900X
The Radeon Pro W6900X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1825 MHz to 2150 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 80 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 17,413 points. Launch price was $4,999.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon 8060S scores 17,989 and the Radeon Pro W6900X reaches 17,413 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon 8060S is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Radeon Pro W6900X uses RDNA 2.0, both on 4 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (Radeon 8060S) vs 5,120 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (Radeon 8060S) vs 22.02 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W6900X). Boost clocks: 2900 MHz vs 2150 MHz. Ray tracing: 40 RT cores (Radeon 8060S) vs 80 (Radeon Pro W6900X).
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 17,989+3% | 17,413 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 5120+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.85 TFLOPS | 22.02 TFLOPS+48% |
| Boost Clock | 2900 MHz+35% | 2150 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 128+100% |
| TMUs | 160 | 320+100% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 40 | 80+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon 8060S comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W6900X has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro W6900X offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System Shared vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (Radeon 8060S) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W6900X) — the Radeon 8060S has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | none | 32 GB |
| Memory Type | LPDDR5X (Shared) | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | System Shared | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+100% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon 8060S) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.5 (Radeon 8060S) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro W6900X). Decoder: VCN 4.5 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon 8060S) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro W6900X).
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.5 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.5 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon 8060S draws 55W versus the Radeon Pro W6900X's 300W — a 138% difference. The Radeon 8060S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon 8060S) vs 650W (Radeon Pro W6900X). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-82% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 327.1+464% | 58.0 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon 8060S launched at $800 MSRP and currently averages $800, while the Radeon Pro W6900X launched at $6000 and now averages $5000. The Radeon 8060S costs 84% less ($4200 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 22.5 (Radeon 8060S) vs 3.5 (Radeon Pro W6900X) — the Radeon 8060S offers 542.9% better value. The Radeon 8060S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | Radeon 8060S | Radeon Pro W6900X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $800-87% | $6000 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $800-84% | $5000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 22.5+543% | 3.5 |
| Codename | Strix Halo | Navi 21 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | August 3 2021 |
| Ranking | #98 | #101 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon 8060S and Radeon Pro W6900X
