RADEON 9800 vs GeForce FX Go5700
RADEON 9800
Popular choices:
GeForce FX Go5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9800 is positioned at rank 740 and the GeForce FX Go5700 is on rank 296, so the GeForce FX Go5700 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9800
Performance Per Dollar GeForce FX Go5700
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The RADEON 9800 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2010). The RADEON 9800 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce FX Go5700 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RADEON 9800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 13.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce FX Go5700 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | RADEON 9800 | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+13.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-13.7%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+300%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the RADEON 9800 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9800 and GeForce FX Go5700
RADEON 9800
The RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.
GeForce FX Go5700
The GeForce FX Go5700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 7 2010. It features the Rankine architecture. The core clock speed is 732 MHz. It has 480 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 219W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9800 scores 58 versus the GeForce FX Go5700's 51 — the RADEON 9800 leads by 13.7%. The RADEON 9800 is built on RDNA 3.5 while the GeForce FX Go5700 uses Rankine, both on 4 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON 9800) vs 480 (GeForce FX Go5700). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800) vs 1.405 TFLOPS (GeForce FX Go5700).
| Feature | RADEON 9800 | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 58+14% | 51 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.5 | Rankine |
| Process Node | 4 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560+433% | 480 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 14.85 TFLOPS+957% | 1.405 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+60% | 40 |
| TMUs | 160+167% | 60 |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+1170% | 0.63 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RADEON 9800 | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RADEON 9800 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce FX Go5700 has 512 MB. The GeForce FX Go5700 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (RADEON 9800) vs 0.63 MB (GeForce FX Go5700) — the RADEON 9800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RADEON 9800 | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.125 GB | 0.5 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 8 MB+1170% | 0.63 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The RADEON 9800 draws 55W versus the GeForce FX Go5700's 219W — a 119.7% difference. The RADEON 9800 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9800) vs 350W (GeForce FX Go5700). Power connectors: Legacy vs Legacy.
| Feature | RADEON 9800 | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-75% | 219W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | Legacy | Legacy |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.1+450% | 0.2 |
Value Analysis
The RADEON 9800 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2010).
| Feature | RADEON 9800 | GeForce FX Go5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $399 | — |
| Codename | Strix Halo | GF110 |
| Release | January 6 2025 | December 7 2010 |
| Ranking | #98 | #497 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on RADEON 9800 and GeForce FX Go5700
