RADEON 9800
VS
Mobility Radeon HD 2300

RADEON 9800 vs Mobility Radeon HD 2300

AMD

RADEON 9800

2025Core: 1295 MHzBoost: 2900 MHz
VS
AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

2010Core: 700 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The RADEON 9800 is positioned at rank 740 and the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is on rank 721, so the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar RADEON 9800

#730
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
72380%
#732
65613%
#733
65440%
#737
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
59507%
#738
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
59100%
#740
RADEON 9800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $399
100%
#742
RADEON 9200 SE
MSRP: $30|Avg: $15
67%
#743
RADEON 9000
MSRP: $49|Avg: $20
67%
#744
MOBILITY RADEON 7500
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
53%
#745
MOBILITY RADEON 9200
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
40%
#746
MOBILITY RADEON 9000
MSRP: $50|Avg: $5
40%
#747
GeForce4 MX 420
MSRP: $99|Avg: $10
33%
#748
RADEON 9250
MSRP: $79|Avg: $25
27%
#749
RADEON 9200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $25
27%
#750
GeForce 256
MSRP: $199|Avg: $20
20%
#751
GeForce4 MX 440
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
20%
#752
GeForce2 MX/MX 400
MSRP: $129|Avg: $15
20%
#753
RADEON 7200
MSRP: $99|Avg: $45
20%
#754
GeForce2 MX
MSRP: $129|Avg: $49
13%
#755
GeForce4 440
MSRP: $469|Avg: $49
7%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar Mobility Radeon HD 2300

#711
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
21288%
#713
19298%
#714
19247%
#718
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
17502%
#719
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
17382%
#721
Mobility Radeon HD 2300
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
100%
#722
GeForce 7800 GTX
MSRP: $599|Avg: $40
88%
#723
RADEON 9600SE
MSRP: $65|Avg: $65
82%
#724
Radeon X1200
MSRP: $80|Avg: $15
80%
#725
Radeon 2100
MSRP: $149|Avg: $49
78%
#726
GeForce 6800
MSRP: $299|Avg: $50
75%
#727
Radeon 3100
MSRP: $199|Avg: $30
73%
#728
GeForce 6800 GT
MSRP: $399|Avg: $40
71%
#729
GeForce 7950 GX2
MSRP: $599|Avg: $80
67%
#730
Mobility Radeon X1450
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
65%
#731
MOBILITY RADEON X1800
MSRP: $399|Avg: $50
65%
#732
MOBILITY RADEON 9550
MSRP: $100|Avg: $10
59%
#733
MOBILITY RADEON 7000 IGP
MSRP: $20|Avg: $5
59%
#734
GeForce 6200
MSRP: $129|Avg: $10
57%
#736
GeForce FX 5500
MSRP: $37|Avg: $30
43%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The RADEON 9800 is significantly newer (2025 vs 2010). The RADEON 9800 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The RADEON 9800 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 13.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRADEON 9800Mobility Radeon HD 2300
Performance
Leading raw performance (+13.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-13.7%)
Longevity
RDNA 3.5 (2024−2025) (4nm)
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2010 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Normal Efficiency
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $15 versus $399 for the RADEON 9800, it costs 96% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 2239% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRADEON 9800Mobility Radeon HD 2300
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+2239%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($399)
More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of RADEON 9800 and Mobility Radeon HD 2300

AMD

RADEON 9800

The RADEON 9800 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2900 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 4 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 58 points.

AMD

Mobility Radeon HD 2300

The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 7 2010. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 700 MHz. It has 800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 51 points.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the RADEON 9800 scores 58 versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2300's 51 — the RADEON 9800 leads by 13.7%. The RADEON 9800 is built on RDNA 3.5 while the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 uses TeraScale 2, both on 4 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (RADEON 9800) vs 800 (Mobility Radeon HD 2300). Raw compute: 14.85 TFLOPS (RADEON 9800) vs 1.12 TFLOPS (Mobility Radeon HD 2300).

FeatureRADEON 9800Mobility Radeon HD 2300
G3D Mark Score
58+14%
51
Architecture
RDNA 3.5
TeraScale 2
Process Node
4 nm
40 nm
Shading Units
2560+220%
800
Compute (TFLOPS)
14.85 TFLOPS+1226%
1.12 TFLOPS
ROPs
64+300%
16
TMUs
160+300%
40
L2 Cache
8 MB+3100%
0.25 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRADEON 9800Mobility Radeon HD 2300
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
AMD Anti-Lag
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The RADEON 9800 comes with 128 MB of VRAM, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 has 512 MB. The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 8 MB (RADEON 9800) vs 0.25 MB (Mobility Radeon HD 2300) — the RADEON 9800 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRADEON 9800Mobility Radeon HD 2300
VRAM Capacity
0.125 GB
0.5 GB+300%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Bus Width
64-bit
128-bit+100%
L2 Cache
8 MB+3100%
0.25 MB
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The RADEON 9800 draws 55W versus the Mobility Radeon HD 2300's 50W — a 9.5% difference. The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (RADEON 9800) vs 350W (Mobility Radeon HD 2300). Power connectors: Legacy vs PCIe-powered.

FeatureRADEON 9800Mobility Radeon HD 2300
TDP
55W
50W-9%
Recommended PSU
350W
350W
Power Connector
Legacy
PCIe-powered
Temp (Load)
80°C
Perf/Watt
1.1+10%
1.0
💰

Value Analysis

The RADEON 9800 launched at $399 MSRP and currently averages $399, while the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 launched at $100 and now averages $15. The Mobility Radeon HD 2300 costs 96.2% less ($384 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 0.1 (RADEON 9800) vs 3.4 (Mobility Radeon HD 2300) — the Mobility Radeon HD 2300 offers 3300% better value. The RADEON 9800 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2010).

FeatureRADEON 9800Mobility Radeon HD 2300
MSRP
$399
$100-75%
Avg Price (30d)
$399
$15-96%
Performance per Dollar
0.1
3.4+3300%
Codename
Strix Halo
Broadway
Release
January 6 2025
January 7 2010
Ranking
#98
#846