Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual vs NVS 510

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual is positioned at rank 494 and the NVS 510 is on rank 321, so the NVS 510 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual

#484

Radeon RX 550X (móvel)

MSRP: $35|Avg: $35

2315%

#486

GeForce GTX 1070 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $150

2099%

#487

GeForce GTX 1060 with Max-Q Design

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $100

2093%

#491

GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)

MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50

1903%

#492

Radeon RX 6300

MSRP: $60|Avg: $40

1890%

#494

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $50

100%

#495

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 8670M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $35

96%

#496

Radeon HD 8180

MSRP: $30|Avg: $5

96%

#498

Radeon R8 M535DX

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

95%

#500

Radeon R5 230

MSRP: $50|Avg: $25

95%

#501

GeForce 9300 GE

MSRP: $23|Avg: $25

94%

#502

Mobility Radeon HD 5450

MSRP: $49|Avg: $15

93%

#503

Radeon HD 8650G + 8570M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

93%

#504

Mobility Radeon HD 4850

MSRP: $199|Avg: $20

93%

#505

GeForce 800A

MSRP: $100|Avg: $30

93%

#506

Radeon HD 7520G + HD 8750M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $150

93%

#507

Radeon HD 8610G + HD 8500M Dual

MSRP: $150|Avg: $30

92%

#508

Radeon R7 M460

MSRP: $250|Avg: $250

91%

#509

Mobility Radeon HD 3870

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

91%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar NVS 510

#306

Tesla K20m

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $55

9783%

#321

NVS 510

MSRP: $449|Avg: $15

100%

#322

GRID M60-1Q

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $50

98%

#323

GRID K280Q

MSRP: $2000|Avg: $50

94%

#324

FirePro M2000

MSRP: $300|Avg: $50

94%

#325

Tesla K20c

MSRP: $3199|Avg: $500

92%

#326

GRID M6-1Q

MSRP: $1500|Avg: $100

91%

#327

Quadro FX 380

MSRP: $129|Avg: $15

91%

#328

Tesla C2050 / C2070

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $30

91%

#329

FirePro M7740

MSRP: $500|Avg: $500

88%

#330

Quadro FX 570

MSRP: $199|Avg: $15

86%

#331

RTXA5000-24Q

MSRP: $3721|Avg: $2100

85%

#332

GRID P40-1Q

MSRP: $3000|Avg: $150

85%

#334

Tesla C2050

MSRP: $2499|Avg: $95

84%

#335

Tesla M10

MSRP: $2500|Avg: $500

84%

#336

FirePro S10000

MSRP: $3599|Avg: $500

83%

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the NVS 510 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

Insight	Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual	NVS 510
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+3.5%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.5%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Legacy)	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	❌ Less VRAM capacity	✅ More VRAM (+300%)
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	—	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The NVS 510 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the NVS 510 holds the technical lead. Priced at $15 (vs $50), it costs 70% less, resulting in a 222% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual	NVS 510
Cost Efficiency	❌Lower cost efficiency	✅Better overall value (+222%)
Upfront Cost	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)	✅More affordable ($15)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual Benchmark Check

NVS 510 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual and NVS 510

Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual

The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 1 2013. The core clock speed is 720 / 775 MHz. It has 768 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 704 points.

NVS 510

The NVS 510 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 4 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 902 MHz to 1033 MHz. It has 512 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 68W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 680 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual scores 704 and the NVS 510 reaches 680 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. Shader units: 768 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual) vs 512 (NVS 510).

Feature	Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual	NVS 510
G3D Mark Score	704+4%	680
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	768+50%	512 ×2

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual	NVS 510
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 1.0 (Software)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the NVS 510 has 2 GB. The NVS 510 offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.

Feature	Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual	NVS 510
VRAM Capacity	0.5 GB	2 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	128-bit+100%	64-bit

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 11.2 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual) vs 12 (11_0) (NVS 510). OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual	NVS 510
DirectX	11.2	12 (11_0)+7%
OpenGL	4.4	4.6+5%
Max Displays	3	4+33%

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: UVD3 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual) vs 1st Gen NVENC (NVS 510). Decoder: UVD3 vs 1st Gen NVDEC (VP5). Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 (NVS 510).

Feature	Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual	NVS 510
Encoder	UVD3	1st Gen NVENC
Decoder	UVD3	1st Gen NVDEC (VP5)
Codecs	H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual draws 50W versus the NVS 510's 68W — a 30.5% difference. The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual) vs 350W (NVS 510). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.

Feature	Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual	NVS 510
TDP	50W-26%	68W
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	—	160mm
Height	—	69mm
Slots	0-100%	1
Temp (Load)	—	65°C
Perf/Watt	14.1+41%	10.0

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual launched at $150 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the NVS 510 launched at $449 and now averages $15. The NVS 510 costs 70% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 14.1 (Radeon HD 7640G + HD 7600M Dual) vs 45.3 (NVS 510) — the NVS 510 offers 221.3% better value. The NVS 510 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2013).