Radeon HD 7670M vs Radeon R5 M240

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Radeon HD 7670M vs Radeon R5 M240 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Radeon HD 7670M vs Radeon R5 M240: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.

Radeon HD 7670M

2012

Why buy it

✅73.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (1 GB vs 512 MB).

Trade-offs

❌2012 hardware with 1 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 4.7 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $100 MSRP).
❌233.3% higher power demand at 100W vs 30W.

Radeon R5 M240

2013

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 4.7 vs 0 G3D/$ ($100 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Draws 30W instead of 100W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon HD 7670M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 512 MB vs 1 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌2013 hardware with 512 MB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.

Quick Answers

Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?

Radeon HD 7670M is the faster gaming card right now. In our data, it leads by 73.2% in average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and by 0.6% in PassMark G3D (476 vs 473), so the answer here is pretty clean.

Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon HD 7670M is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond. The case is simple: 1 GB vs 512 MB of VRAM. That gives it more room for heavier textures and higher settings over time.

Which GPU is the better buy today?

Radeon R5 M240 makes the most sense today based on the pricing and value data we have for this matchup. If you are mainly targeting 1080p and some 1440p, Radeon R5 M240 is the easier value choice. If you care more about 1080p and some 1440p headroom, Radeon HD 7670M has the stronger long-term case.

Radeon HD 7670M vs Radeon R5 M240 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Radeon HD 7670M

The Radeon HD 7670M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 850 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 476 points.

Radeon R5 M240

The Radeon R5 M240 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in October 8 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 780 MHz. It has 320 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 473 points. Launch price was $69.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon HD 7670M scores 476 and the Radeon R5 M240 reaches 473 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7670M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon R5 M240 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 7670M) vs 320 (Radeon R5 M240). Raw compute: 2.176 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7670M) vs 0.448 TFLOPS (Radeon R5 M240).

Feature	Radeon HD 7670M	Radeon R5 M240
G3D Mark Score	476	473
Architecture	GCN 1.0	GCN 1.0
Process Node	28 nm	28 nm
Shading Units	1280+300%	320
Compute (TFLOPS)	2.176 TFLOPS+386%	0.448 TFLOPS
ROPs	32+300%	8
TMUs	80+300%	20
L1 Cache	320 KB+300%	80 KB
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon HD 7670M	Radeon R5 M240
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 7670M has 1 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon R5 M240 carries 512 MB. Radeon HD 7670M gives you 100% more memory capacity, which matters more once you move into heavier textures, mods, or higher resolutions. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon HD 7670M and 128-bit on the Radeon R5 M240. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon HD 7670M) vs 256 KB (Radeon R5 M240) — the Radeon HD 7670M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon HD 7670M	Radeon R5 M240
VRAM Capacity	1 GB+100%	0.5 GB
Memory Type	Shared	GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth	System	Unknown
Bus Width	System	128-bit
L2 Cache	512 KB+100%	256 KB

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 7670M draws 100W versus the Radeon R5 M240's 30W — a 107.7% difference. The Radeon R5 M240 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 7670M) vs 350W (Radeon R5 M240). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon HD 7670M	Radeon R5 M240
TDP	100W	30W-70%
Recommended PSU	350W	350W
Power Connector	1x 6-pin	Mobile
Length	—	1mm
Slots	—	0
Perf/Watt	4.8	15.8+229%

💰

Value Analysis

The newer card here is Radeon R5 M240 (2013 vs 2012).

Feature	Radeon HD 7670M	Radeon R5 M240
MSRP	—	$100
Codename	Wimbledon	Oland
Release	April 24 2012	October 8 2013
Ranking	#531	#911

Search Radeon HD 7670M on Amazon

Search Radeon R5 M240 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.