CPU
GPU
Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280
Popular choices:
Radeon HD 7870
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 4.3% higher G3D Mark score and 50% more VRAM (3 GB vs 2 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 7870.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 | Radeon HD 7870 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+4.3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-4.3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) | ❌ Less VRAM capacity |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (278mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $45), it costs 22% less, resulting in a 34.1% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 | Radeon HD 7870 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+34.1%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($35) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($45) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 and Radeon HD 7870
Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280
The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 31 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1250 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,765 points. Launch price was $449.
Radeon HD 7870
The Radeon HD 7870 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 4,568 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 scores 4,765 and the Radeon HD 7870 reaches 4,568 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 7870 uses GCN 1.0, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280) vs 1,280 (Radeon HD 7870). Raw compute: 2.867 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280) vs 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7870).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 | Radeon HD 7870 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 4,765+4% | 4,568 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | GCN 1.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+40% | 1280 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.867 TFLOPS+12% | 2.56 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 112+40% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 448 KB+40% | 320 KB |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 | Radeon HD 7870 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 comes with 3 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7870 has 2 GB. The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 240 GB/s (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280) vs 153.6 GB/s (Radeon HD 7870) — a 56.3% advantage for the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 768 KB (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 7870) — the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 | Radeon HD 7870 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 3 GB+50% | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 240 GB/s+56% | 153.6 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 768 KB+50% | 512 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280) vs 12 (11_1) (Radeon HD 7870). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 | Radeon HD 7870 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 (11_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280) vs VCE 1.0 (Radeon HD 7870). Decoder: UVD 3.2 vs UVD 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MVC (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280) vs H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 (Radeon HD 7870).
| Feature | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 | Radeon HD 7870 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 1.0 | VCE 1.0 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.2 | UVD 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1,MVC | H.264,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 draws 200W versus the Radeon HD 7870's 200W — a 0% difference. The Radeon HD 7870 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280) vs 500W (Radeon HD 7870). Power connectors: 2x 6-pin vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 278mm vs 241mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 | Radeon HD 7870 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 2x 6-pin | 2x 6-pin |
| Length | 278mm | 241mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 23.8+4% | 22.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 launched at $279 MSRP and currently averages $35, while the Radeon HD 7870 launched at $349 and now averages $45. The Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 costs 22.2% less ($10 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 136.1 (Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280) vs 101.5 (Radeon HD 7870) — the Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 offers 34.1% better value.
| Feature | Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 | Radeon HD 7870 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $279-20% | $349 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $35-22% | $45 |
| Performance per Dollar | 136.1+34% | 101.5 |
| Codename | Tahiti | Pitcairn |
| Release | January 31 2012 | March 5 2012 |
| Ranking | #454 | #460 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 7950 / R9 280 and Radeon HD 7870
