Radeon HD 8210 vs GeForce 9400 GT
Radeon HD 8210
Popular choices:
GeForce 9400 GT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8210 is positioned at rank 212 and the GeForce 9400 GT is on rank 573, so the Radeon HD 8210 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8210
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 9400 GT
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8210 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.1% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 9400 GT offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8210 | GeForce 9400 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / Maxwell (2014−2017)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8210 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8210 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $20), it costs 75% less, resulting in a 308.4% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8210 | GeForce 9400 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+308.4%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($5) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($20) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8210 and GeForce 9400 GT
Radeon HD 8210
The Radeon HD 8210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 195 points. Launch price was $349.
GeForce 9400 GT
The GeForce 9400 GT is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 13 2015. It features the Maxwell architecture. The core clock ranges from 1072 MHz to 1176 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 33W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 191 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8210 scores 195 and the GeForce 9400 GT reaches 191 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8210 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 9400 GT uses Maxwell, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 8210) vs 384 (GeForce 9400 GT). Raw compute: 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8210) vs 0.9032 TFLOPS (GeForce 9400 GT).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8210 | GeForce 9400 GT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 195+2% | 191 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Maxwell |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+233% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.56 TFLOPS+183% | 0.9032 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+300% | 8 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+67% | 192 KB |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8210 | GeForce 9400 GT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8210 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 9400 GT has 1 GB. The GeForce 9400 GT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 0.5 MB (Radeon HD 8210) vs 1 MB (GeForce 9400 GT) — the GeForce 9400 GT has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8210 | GeForce 9400 GT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB+100% |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8210 draws 200W versus the GeForce 9400 GT's 33W — a 143.3% difference. The GeForce 9400 GT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8210) vs 350W (GeForce 9400 GT). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8210 | GeForce 9400 GT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 33W-84% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0 | 5.8+480% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8210 launched at $35 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the GeForce 9400 GT launched at $59 and now averages $20. The Radeon HD 8210 costs 75% less ($15 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.0 (Radeon HD 8210) vs 9.6 (GeForce 9400 GT) — the Radeon HD 8210 offers 306.3% better value. The GeForce 9400 GT is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8210 | GeForce 9400 GT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $35-41% | $59 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-75% | $20 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.0+306% | 9.6 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GM108 |
| Release | March 5 2012 | March 13 2015 |
| Ranking | #460 | #847 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon HD 8210 and GeForce 9400 GT
