
Radeon HD 8210 vs GeForce GT 120

Radeon HD 8210
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 120
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8210 is positioned at rank 212 and the GeForce GT 120 is on rank 317, so the Radeon HD 8210 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8210
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 120
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8210 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.7% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GT 120.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8210 | GeForce GT 120 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.7%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.7%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2017 / Pascal (2016−2021)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon HD 8210 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon HD 8210 holds the technical lead. Priced at $5 (vs $40), it costs 88% less, resulting in a 729.8% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8210 | GeForce GT 120 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+729.8%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($5) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8210 and GeForce GT 120

Radeon HD 8210
The Radeon HD 8210 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1280 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 195 points. Launch price was $349.

GeForce GT 120
The GeForce GT 120 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 17 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1228 MHz to 1468 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 188 points. Launch price was $79.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8210 scores 195 and the GeForce GT 120 reaches 188 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8210 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GT 120 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 1,280 (Radeon HD 8210) vs 384 (GeForce GT 120). Raw compute: 2.56 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8210) vs 1.127 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 120).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8210 | GeForce GT 120 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 195+4% | 188 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 1280+233% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 2.56 TFLOPS+127% | 1.127 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 80+233% | 24 |
| L1 Cache | 320 KB+122% | 144 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8210 | GeForce GT 120 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8210 | GeForce GT 120 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8210 draws 200W versus the GeForce GT 120's 30W — a 147.8% difference. The GeForce GT 120 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8210) vs 350W (GeForce GT 120). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8210 | GeForce GT 120 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 200W | 30W-85% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 168mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 65°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.0 | 6.3+530% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon HD 8210 launched at $35 MSRP and currently averages $5, while the GeForce GT 120 launched at $100 and now averages $40. The Radeon HD 8210 costs 87.5% less ($35 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 39.0 (Radeon HD 8210) vs 4.7 (GeForce GT 120) — the Radeon HD 8210 offers 729.8% better value. The GeForce GT 120 is the newer GPU (2017 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8210 | GeForce GT 120 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $35-65% | $100 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5-88% | $40 |
| Performance per Dollar | 39.0+730% | 4.7 |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GP108 |
| Release | March 5 2012 | May 17 2017 |
| Ranking | #460 | #641 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















