
Radeon HD 8350 vs GeForce Go 7700

Radeon HD 8350
Popular choices:

GeForce Go 7700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 8350 is positioned at rank #337 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8350
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8350 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 10.1% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce Go 7700.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8350 | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+10.1%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-10.1%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 8350 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8350 and GeForce Go 7700

Radeon HD 8350
The Radeon HD 8350 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in March 5 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 1000 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 130W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 163 points. Launch price was $249.

GeForce Go 7700
The GeForce Go 7700 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 30 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock ranges from 1046 MHz to 1085 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 230W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 148 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 8350 scores 163 versus the GeForce Go 7700's 148 — the Radeon HD 8350 leads by 10.1%. The Radeon HD 8350 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce Go 7700 uses Kepler, both on a 28 nm process. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon HD 8350) vs 1,536 (GeForce Go 7700). Raw compute: 1.761 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8350) vs 3.333 TFLOPS (GeForce Go 7700). Boost clocks: 1000 MHz vs 1085 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8350 | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 163+10% | 148 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024 | 1536+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.761 TFLOPS | 3.333 TFLOPS+89% |
| Boost Clock | 1000 MHz | 1085 MHz+9% |
| ROPs | 32 | 32 |
| TMUs | 64 | 128+100% |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB+100% | 128 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8350 | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 512 MB of GDDR5. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8350 | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.5 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | Unknown | Unknown |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB | 512 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8350 draws 130W versus the GeForce Go 7700's 230W — a 55.6% difference. The Radeon HD 8350 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8350) vs 350W (GeForce Go 7700). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs Legacy.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8350 | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 130W-43% | 230W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | Legacy |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | — | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 1.3+117% | 0.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce Go 7700 is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2012).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8350 | GeForce Go 7700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $200 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $39 | — |
| Codename | Pitcairn | GK104 |
| Release | March 5 2012 | May 30 2013 |
| Ranking | #503 | #398 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















