
Radeon HD 8500M vs Radeon HD 7650M

Radeon HD 8500M
Popular choices:

Radeon HD 7650M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon HD 8500M is positioned at rank 498 and the Radeon HD 7650M is on rank 430, so the Radeon HD 7650M offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8500M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 7650M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon HD 8500M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Radeon HD 7650M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon HD 8500M | Radeon HD 7650M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2012 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon HD 8500M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8500M and Radeon HD 7650M

Radeon HD 8500M
The Radeon HD 8500M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 24 2012. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 675 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 40W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 447 points.

Radeon HD 7650M
The Radeon HD 7650M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2011. It features the TeraScale 2 architecture. The core clock speed is 580 MHz. It has 960 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 434 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon HD 8500M scores 447 and the Radeon HD 7650M reaches 434 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon HD 8500M is built on GCN 1.0 while the Radeon HD 7650M uses TeraScale 2, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 8500M) vs 960 (Radeon HD 7650M). Raw compute: 0.864 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8500M) vs 1.114 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 7650M).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8500M | Radeon HD 7650M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 447+3% | 434 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | TeraScale 2 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 640 | 960+50% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 0.864 TFLOPS | 1.114 TFLOPS+29% |
| ROPs | 16 | 32+100% |
| TMUs | 40 | 48+20% |
| L1 Cache | 160 KB | 192 KB+20% |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon HD 8500M | Radeon HD 7650M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon HD 8500M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Radeon HD 7650M has 1 GB. The Radeon HD 7650M offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs System. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon HD 8500M) vs 512 KB (Radeon HD 7650M) — the Radeon HD 7650M has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8500M | Radeon HD 7650M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 1 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | Shared | Shared |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | System |
| Bus Width | System | System |
| L2 Cache | 256 KB | 512 KB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 11.1 (11_0) (Radeon HD 8500M) vs 11.2 (FL11_0) (Radeon HD 7650M). Vulkan: 1.0 vs N/A. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.4. Maximum simultaneous displays: 2 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8500M | Radeon HD 7650M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 11.1 (11_0) | 11.2 (FL11_0) |
| Vulkan | 1.0 | N/A |
| OpenGL | 4.6+5% | 4.4 |
| Max Displays | 2 | 4+100% |
Media & Encoding
Decoder: UVD 3.0 vs UVD3. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 (Radeon HD 8500M) vs H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 (Radeon HD 7650M).
| Feature | Radeon HD 8500M | Radeon HD 7650M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | — | UVD3 |
| Decoder | UVD 3.0 | UVD3 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 Part 2 | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon HD 8500M draws 40W versus the Radeon HD 7650M's 50W — a 22.2% difference. The Radeon HD 8500M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8500M) vs 350W (Radeon HD 7650M). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 1x 6-pin. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon HD 8500M | Radeon HD 7650M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 40W-20% | 50W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | 1x 6-pin | 1x 6-pin |
| Length | — | 0mm |
| Height | — | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 70°C-7% |
| Perf/Watt | 11.2+29% | 8.7 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















