Radeon HD 8600/8700M
VS
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Radeon HD 8600/8700M vs GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

AMD

Radeon HD 8600/8700M

2013Core: 725 MHzBoost: 775 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

2020Core: 1410 MHzBoost: 1665 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. The Radeon HD 8600/8700M is positioned at rank #390 in our cost-efficiency ranking, representing a Lower cost-benefit for your build. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon HD 8600/8700M

#380
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
1265%
#382
1147%
#383
1144%
#387
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
1040%
#388
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
1033%
#390
Radeon HD 8600/8700M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $30
100%
#391
Radeon R9 M395X
MSRP: $600|Avg: $150
99%
#393
Radeon R9 M485X
MSRP: $450|Avg: $150
98%
#394
Radeon HD 8570D + HD 6670 Dual
MSRP: $150|Avg: $100
98%
#395
Radeon HD 6650A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $50
97%
#396
GeForce 920A
MSRP: $100|Avg: $15
97%
#397
GeForce 930A
MSRP: $150|Avg: $20
96%
#398
Mobility Radeon HD 4650
MSRP: $49|Avg: $15
95%
#400
Radeon R9 M290X
MSRP: $400|Avg: $60
94%
#401
Radeon HD 7670
MSRP: $100|Avg: $25
94%
#402
Radeon HD 8550G + 8750M Dual
MSRP: $100|Avg: $100
93%
#403
Mobility Radeon HD 5000
MSRP: $99|Avg: $20
91%
#404
Iris Pro Graphics 5200
MSRP: $150|Avg: $40
91%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
100%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
96%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
95%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
95%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
94%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
93%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
93%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
92%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
91%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
90%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
90%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
89%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
88%
#15
Radeon RX 6500 XT
MSRP: $199|Avg: $150
88%
#16
GeForce RTX 3070
MSRP: $499|Avg: $200
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is significantly newer (2020 vs 2013). The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Radeon HD 8600/8700M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1872% higher G3D Mark score and 1500% more VRAM (8 GB vs 512 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon HD 8600/8700M.

InsightRadeon HD 8600/8700MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Performance
Lower raw frame rates (-1872%)
Leading raw performance (+1872%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))
🔮Strong Longevity (Ampere (2020−2025) / 8nm)
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
🎮 High Capacity (8 GB)
Efficiency
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
Case Fit
📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Although it costs $280 (vs $30), its significant performance lead justifies the premium, offering 111.3% better value per dollar than the Radeon HD 8600/8700M.

InsightRadeon HD 8600/8700MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+111.3%)
Upfront Cost
More affordable ($30)
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($280)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon HD 8600/8700M and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

AMD

Radeon HD 8600/8700M

The Radeon HD 8600/8700M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 725 MHz to 775 MHz. It has 640 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,030 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon HD 8600/8700M scores 1,030 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 1872%. The Radeon HD 8600/8700M is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 28 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 640 (Radeon HD 8600/8700M) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 0.992 TFLOPS (Radeon HD 8600/8700M) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 775 MHz vs 1665 MHz.

FeatureRadeon HD 8600/8700MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
G3D Mark Score
1,030
20,312+1872%
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Ampere
Process Node
28 nm
8 nm
Shading Units
640
4864+660%
Compute (TFLOPS)
0.992 TFLOPS
16.2 TFLOPS+1533%
Boost Clock
775 MHz
1665 MHz+115%
ROPs
16
80+400%
TMUs
40
152+280%
L1 Cache
0.16 MB
4.8 MB+2900%
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
4 MB+1500%

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon HD 8600/8700MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
DLSS 2.0
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
NVIDIA Reflex
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon HD 8600/8700M comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 1500% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 0.25 MB (Radeon HD 8600/8700M) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureRadeon HD 8600/8700MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
8 GB+1500%
Memory Type
Shared
GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth
System
448 GB/s
Bus Width
System
256-bit
L2 Cache
0.25 MB
4 MB+1500%
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon HD 8600/8700M draws 50W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 120% difference. The Radeon HD 8600/8700M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon HD 8600/8700M) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: 1x 6-pin vs 8-pin.

FeatureRadeon HD 8600/8700MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
TDP
50W-75%
200W
Recommended PSU
350W-42%
600W
Power Connector
1x 6-pin
8-pin
Length
242mm
Height
112mm
Slots
2
Temp (Load)
75
Perf/Watt
20.6
101.6+393%
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon HD 8600/8700M costs 89.3% less ($250 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 34.3 (Radeon HD 8600/8700M) vs 72.5 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 111.4% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2013).

FeatureRadeon HD 8600/8700MGeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP
$399
Avg Price (30d)
$30-89%
$280
Performance per Dollar
34.3
72.5+111%
Codename
Venus
GA104
Release
April 1 2013
December 1 2020
Ranking
#745
#73