CPU
GPU
Radeon Pro W5500
Popular choices:
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon Pro W5500 is positioned at rank 69 and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design is on rank 96, so the Radeon Pro W5500 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro W5500
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Pro W5500 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.8% higher G3D Mark score and 33.3% more VRAM (8 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design.
| Insight | Radeon Pro W5500 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.8%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.8%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) (7nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (8 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Pro W5500 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5500 and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design
Radeon Pro W5500
The Radeon Pro W5500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in February 10 2020. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1187 MHz to 1400 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,913 points. Launch price was $399.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 23 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1335 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 60W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 8,589 points. Launch price was $229.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5500 scores 8,913 and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design reaches 8,589 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5500 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 7 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,408 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 3.942 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 4.101 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1400 MHz vs 1335 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 8,913+4% | 8,589 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 1536+9% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 3.942 TFLOPS | 4.101 TFLOPS+4% |
| Boost Clock | 1400 MHz+5% | 1335 MHz |
| ROPs | 32 | 48+50% |
| TMUs | 88 | 96+9% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W5500 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design has 6 GB. The Radeon Pro W5500 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design) — the Radeon Pro W5500 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+33% | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.2 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 (12_1) |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | 1.4+17% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 7th Gen NVENC (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 4th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: HEVC,H.264,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5500) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | 4th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | HEVC,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5500 draws 125W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design's 60W — a 70.3% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5500) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 60W-52% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 241mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 1 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 71.3 | 143.2+101% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5500 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5500 | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $300 | — |
| Codename | Navi 14 | TU116 |
| Release | February 10 2020 | April 23 2019 |
| Ranking | #294 | #299 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Pro W5500 and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti with Max-Q Design
