Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
VS
GeForce GTX 285

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) vs GeForce GTX 285

AMD

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

2016Boost: 800 MHz
VS
NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 285

2008Core: 648 MHz

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is positioned at rank 185 and the GeForce GTX 285 is on rank 255, so the Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

#175
Radeon RX 550X (móvel)
MSRP: $35|Avg: $35
362%
#177
328%
#178
327%
#182
GeForce GTX 1050 (Mobile)
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $50
298%
#183
Radeon RX 6300
MSRP: $60|Avg: $40
296%
#185
Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
100%
#187
GeForce MX550
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
100%
#195
GeForce GT625M
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $45
94%
#197
93%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar GeForce GTX 285

#1
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
MSRP: $399|Avg: $280
1765%
#2
GeForce RTX 5060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1696%
#3
Radeon RX 5600 XT
MSRP: $279|Avg: $180
1676%
#4
Radeon RX 9060
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1673%
#5
GeForce RTX 5050
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1670%
#6
GeForce RTX 3050 OEM
MSRP: $249|Avg: $150
1660%
#7
Arc A580
MSRP: $179|Avg: $179
1639%
#8
Radeon RX 9060 XT
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1633%
#9
Radeon RX 9060 XT 8GB
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1618%
#10
Radeon RX 7600
MSRP: $269|Avg: $250
1614%
#11
Radeon RX 6600
MSRP: $329|Avg: $180
1594%
#12
GeForce RTX 4060
MSRP: $299|Avg: $299
1591%
#13
Arc B570
MSRP: $219|Avg: $219
1562%
#14
Arc B580
MSRP: $249|Avg: $249
1561%
#240
Radeon R5 430 OEM
MSRP: N/A|Avg: $13
1946%
#255
GeForce GTX 285
MSRP: $359|Avg: $30
100%
#256
Radeon HD 7570
MSRP: $150|Avg: $150
99%
#257
Radeon HD 6380G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
98%
#258
Radeon HD 4550
MSRP: $59|Avg: $15
97%
#259
RADEON HD7450
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
97%
#260
GeForce GT 330
MSRP: $99|Avg: $30
97%
#262
Radeon HD 7340G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $15
95%
#263
Radeon HD 8210E
MSRP: $50|Avg: $50
94%
#264
Radeon 535DX
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
94%
#266
GeForce GT 120 / 9500 GT
MSRP: $85|Avg: $15
93%
#267
GeForce GT 130
MSRP: $100|Avg: $20
93%
#268
Radeon M535DX
MSRP: $200|Avg: $40
91%
#269
Radeon HD 7310G
MSRP: $50|Avg: $10
88%
Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

⚠️ Generational Difference

The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is significantly newer (2016 vs 2008). The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GTX 285 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.7% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GTX 285 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.

InsightRadeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)GeForce GTX 285
Performance
Leading raw performance (+1.7%)
Lower raw frame rates (-1.7%)
Longevity
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2016 / GCN 1.2/2.0 (2015−2016))
🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013))
Ecosystem
Supports FSR Upscaling
Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM
❌ Less VRAM capacity
✅ More VRAM (+100%)
Efficiency
💡 Excellent Perf/Watt
⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit

💎 Value Proposition

The GeForce GTX 285 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the GeForce GTX 285 holds the technical lead. Priced at $30 (vs $50), it costs 40% less, resulting in a 63.9% higher cost efficiency score.

InsightRadeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)GeForce GTX 285
Cost Efficiency
Lower cost efficiency
Better overall value (+63.9%)
Upfront Cost
⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)
More affordable ($30)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) and GeForce GTX 285

AMD

Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)

The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 1 2016. It features the GCN 1.2/2.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 12W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,500 points.

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 285

The GeForce GTX 285 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 23 2008. It features the Tesla 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 648 MHz. It has 240 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 204W. Manufactured using 55 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,475 points. Launch price was $359.

Graphics Performance

The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) scores 1,500 and the GeForce GTX 285 reaches 1,475 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is built on GCN 1.2/2.0 while the GeForce GTX 285 uses Tesla 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 55 nm. Shader units: 384 (Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)) vs 240 (GeForce GTX 285).

FeatureRadeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)GeForce GTX 285
G3D Mark Score
1,500+2%
1,475
Architecture
GCN 1.2/2.0
Tesla 2.0
Process Node
28 nm
55 nm
Shading Units
384+60%
240

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureRadeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)GeForce GTX 285
Upscaling Tech
FSR 1.0 (Software)
FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation
Not Supported
FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
AMD Anti-Lag
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 285 has 1 GB. The GeForce GTX 285 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.

FeatureRadeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)GeForce GTX 285
VRAM Capacity
0.5 GB
1 GB+100%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5
Memory Bandwidth
Unknown
Unknown
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) draws 12W versus the GeForce GTX 285's 204W — a 177.8% difference. The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)) vs 550W (GeForce GTX 285). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin.

FeatureRadeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)GeForce GTX 285
TDP
12W-94%
204W
Recommended PSU
350W-36%
550W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
2x 6-pin
Perf/Watt
125.0+1636%
7.2
💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) launched at $50 MSRP and currently averages $50, while the GeForce GTX 285 launched at $359 and now averages $30. The GeForce GTX 285 costs 40% less ($20 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 30.0 (Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)) vs 49.2 (GeForce GTX 285) — the GeForce GTX 285 offers 64% better value. The Radeon R5 (Bristol Ridge) is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2008).

FeatureRadeon R5 (Bristol Ridge)GeForce GTX 285
MSRP
$50-86%
$359
Avg Price (30d)
$50
$30-40%
Performance per Dollar
30.0
49.2+64%
Codename
Bristol Ridge
GT200B
Release
June 1 2016
December 23 2008
Ranking
#904
#771