
Radeon R6 vs GeForce GT 430

Radeon R6
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 430
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 430
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon R6 uses modern memory architecture. The Radeon R6 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 430 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R6 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.5% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 430 offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R6 | GeForce GT 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.5%) |
| Longevity | GCN 4.0 (2016−2020) (14nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2014 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce GT 430 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $40 versus $49 for the Radeon R6, it costs 18% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 20.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R6 | GeForce GT 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+20.7%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($49) | ✅More affordable ($40) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R6 and GeForce GT 430

Radeon R6
The Radeon R6 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2019. It features the GCN 4.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1082 MHz to 1218 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 612 points.

GeForce GT 430
The GeForce GT 430 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 29 2014. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 993 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 64W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 603 points. Launch price was $89.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R6 scores 612 and the GeForce GT 430 reaches 603 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R6 is built on GCN 4.0 while the GeForce GT 430 uses Kepler, both on 14 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R6) vs 384 (GeForce GT 430). Raw compute: 1.247 TFLOPS (Radeon R6) vs 0.7626 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 430).
| Feature | Radeon R6 | GeForce GT 430 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 612+1% | 603 |
| Architecture | GCN 4.0 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+33% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.247 TFLOPS+64% | 0.7626 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 16 | 16 |
| TMUs | 32 | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 128 KB+300% | 32 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R6 | GeForce GT 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R6 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 430 has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 430 offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R6) vs 256 KB (GeForce GT 430) — the Radeon R6 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R6 | GeForce GT 430 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0 GB | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 128-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_0) (Radeon R6) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 430). Vulkan: 1.2 vs None. OpenGL: 4.4 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon R6 | GeForce GT 430 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_0)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.2 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.4+10% | 4.0 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R6) vs No (GeForce GT 430). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX (Radeon R6) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 430).
| Feature | Radeon R6 | GeForce GT 430 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | No |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,DivX | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R6 draws 50W versus the GeForce GT 430's 64W — a 24.6% difference. The Radeon R6 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R6) vs 300W (GeForce GT 430). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs None. Typical load temperature: 65°C vs 70°C.
| Feature | Radeon R6 | GeForce GT 430 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 50W-22% | 64W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 300W-14% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | None |
| Length | — | 145mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | 65°C-7% | 70°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.2+30% | 9.4 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R6 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce GT 430 launched at $79 and now averages $40. The GeForce GT 430 costs 18.4% less ($9 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 12.5 (Radeon R6) vs 15.1 (GeForce GT 430) — the GeForce GT 430 offers 20.8% better value. The Radeon R6 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2014).
| Feature | Radeon R6 | GeForce GT 430 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $79 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49 | $40-18% |
| Performance per Dollar | 12.5 | 15.1+21% |
| Codename | Polaris 23 | GK107 |
| Release | May 13 2019 | May 29 2014 |
| Ranking | #757 | #777 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















