Radeon R7 A370 vs Quadro 2000 D
Radeon R7 A370
Popular choices:
Quadro 2000 D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money. The Radeon R7 A370 is positioned at rank 147 and the Quadro 2000 D is on rank 288, so the Radeon R7 A370 offers better cost-efficiency for playing games.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon R7 A370
Performance Per Dollar Quadro 2000 D
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7 A370 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 3.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the Quadro 2000 D offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A370 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+3.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-3.4%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+700%) |
| Efficiency | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt |
| Case Fit | — | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The Quadro 2000 D offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Quadro 2000 D holds the technical lead. Priced at $35 (vs $51), it costs 31% less, resulting in a 40.9% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7 A370 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+40.9%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($51) | ✅More affordable ($35) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7 A370 and Quadro 2000 D
Radeon R7 A370
The Radeon R7 A370 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 18 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The boost clock speed is 975 MHz. It has 1024 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,281 points. Launch price was $149.
Quadro 2000 D
The Quadro 2000 D is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 5 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 625 MHz. It has 192 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 62W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 1,239 points. Launch price was $599.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7 A370 scores 1,281 and the Quadro 2000 D reaches 1,239 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7 A370 is built on GCN 1.0 while the Quadro 2000 D uses Fermi, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,024 (Radeon R7 A370) vs 192 (Quadro 2000 D). Raw compute: 1.997 TFLOPS (Radeon R7 A370) vs 0.48 TFLOPS (Quadro 2000 D).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A370 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 1,281+3% | 1,239 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1024+433% | 192 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.997 TFLOPS+316% | 0.48 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 32+100% | 16 |
| TMUs | 64+100% | 32 |
| L1 Cache | 256 KB | 256 KB |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7 A370 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7 A370 comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the Quadro 2000 D has 4 GB. The Quadro 2000 D offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 512 KB (Radeon R7 A370) vs 256 KB (Quadro 2000 D) — the Radeon R7 A370 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A370 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 4 GB+700% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit+100% | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 512 KB+100% | 256 KB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7 A370 draws 100W versus the Quadro 2000 D's 62W — a 46.9% difference. The Quadro 2000 D is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7 A370) vs 350W (Quadro 2000 D). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon R7 A370 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 100W | 62W-38% |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | — | 178mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | — | 1 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 12.8 | 20.0+56% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7 A370 launched at $149 MSRP and currently averages $51, while the Quadro 2000 D launched at $599 and now averages $35. The Quadro 2000 D costs 31.4% less ($16 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 25.1 (Radeon R7 A370) vs 35.4 (Quadro 2000 D) — the Quadro 2000 D offers 41% better value. The Radeon R7 A370 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon R7 A370 | Quadro 2000 D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $149-75% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $51 | $35-31% |
| Performance per Dollar | 25.1 | 35.4+41% |
| Codename | Trinidad | GF106 |
| Release | June 18 2015 | October 5 2011 |
| Ranking | #467 | #892 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon R7 A370 and Quadro 2000 D
