
Radeon R7E vs GeForce 8800 GTX

Radeon R7E
Popular choices:

GeForce 8800 GTX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce 8800 GTX
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon R7E is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.6% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce 8800 GTX offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon R7E | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.6%) |
| Longevity | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2008 / G9x (2007−2010)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+50%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
The Radeon R7E offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon R7E holds the technical lead. Priced at $49 (vs $50), it costs 2% less, resulting in a 3.7% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon R7E | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+3.7%) | ❌Lower cost efficiency |
| Upfront Cost | ✅More affordable ($49) | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon R7E and GeForce 8800 GTX

Radeon R7E
The Radeon R7E is manufactured by AMD. It was released in December 20 2013. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 800 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 565 points. Launch price was $109.

GeForce 8800 GTX
The GeForce 8800 GTX is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 15 2008. It features the G9x architecture. The core clock speed is 500 MHz. It has 224 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 65 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 556 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon R7E scores 565 and the GeForce 8800 GTX reaches 556 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon R7E is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce 8800 GTX uses G9x, both on 28 nm vs 65 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon R7E) vs 224 (GeForce 8800 GTX).
| Feature | Radeon R7E | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 565+2% | 556 |
| Architecture | GCN 1.0 | G9x |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 65 nm |
| Shading Units | 512+129% | 224 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon R7E | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 2.1 (Compatible) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon R7E comes with 512 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce 8800 GTX has 768 MB. The GeForce 8800 GTX offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 64-bit.
| Feature | Radeon R7E | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 0.5 GB | 0.75 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 64-bit | 64-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon R7E) vs 10.0 (GeForce 8800 GTX). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.
| Feature | Radeon R7E | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12_0+20% | 10.0 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 2 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon R7E) vs None (GeForce 8800 GTX). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo HD (VP2).
| Feature | Radeon R7E | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCE 2.0 | None |
| Decoder | UVD 4.2 | PureVideo HD (VP2) |
| Codecs | — | MPEG-2,VC-1,H.264 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon R7E draws 55W versus the GeForce 8800 GTX's 150W — a 92.7% difference. The Radeon R7E is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon R7E) vs 350W (GeForce 8800 GTX). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 1mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.
| Feature | Radeon R7E | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 55W-63% | 150W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 1mm | 267mm |
| Height | — | 111mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | — | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 10.3+178% | 3.7 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon R7E launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $49, while the GeForce 8800 GTX launched at $599 and now averages $50. The Radeon R7E costs 2% less ($1 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 11.5 (Radeon R7E) vs 11.1 (GeForce 8800 GTX) — the Radeon R7E offers 3.6% better value. The Radeon R7E is the newer GPU (2013 vs 2008).
| Feature | Radeon R7E | GeForce 8800 GTX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0-100% | $599 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $49-2% | $50 |
| Performance per Dollar | 11.5+4% | 11.1 |
| Codename | Cape Verde | NB9E-GTX |
| Release | December 20 2013 | July 15 2008 |
| Ranking | #738 | #825 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















