
Radeon RX 7600
Popular choices:

Tesla T4
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon RX 7600
2023Why buy it
- ✅+63.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,611 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1041.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌135.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 70W.
- ❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.
Tesla T4
2018Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 165W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,153 vs 16,581).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌598.9% HIGHER MSRP$1,880 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7600
2023Tesla T4
2018Why buy it
- ✅+63.3% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Costs $1,611 less on MSRP ($269 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1041.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs $1,880 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 165W, a 95W reduction.
- ✅Measures 168mm instead of 240mm, a 72mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌135.7% higher power demand at 165W vs 70W.
- ❌42.9% longer card at 240mm vs 168mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (10,153 vs 16,581).
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌598.9% HIGHER MSRP$1,880 MSRPvs$269 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 61.6 G3D/$ ($1,880 MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7600 better than Tesla T4?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Tesla T4 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 168 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 149 FPS | 144 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 111 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 140 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 114 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 85 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 72 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 59 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 414 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 349 FPS | 143 FPS |
| high | 267 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 206 FPS | 103 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 241 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 205 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 163 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 130 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 109 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 63 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 746 FPS | 457 FPS |
| medium | 597 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 497 FPS | 305 FPS |
| ultra | 373 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 560 FPS | 343 FPS |
| medium | 448 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 373 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 280 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 373 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 298 FPS | 183 FPS |
| high | 249 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 114 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 604 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 517 FPS | 265 FPS |
| high | 443 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 468 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 397 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 322 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 259 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 293 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 271 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 92 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 67 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7600 and Tesla T4

Radeon RX 7600
Radeon RX 7600
The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.

Tesla T4
Tesla T4
The Tesla T4 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 13 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 585 MHz to 1590 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 10,153 points.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the Radeon RX 7600 scores 16,581 versus the Tesla T4's 10,153 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 63.3%. The Radeon RX 7600 is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Tesla T4 uses Turing, both on 6 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 2,560 (Tesla T4). Raw compute: 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600) vs 8.141 TFLOPS (Tesla T4). Boost clocks: 2655 MHz vs 1590 MHz. Ray tracing: 32 RT cores (Radeon RX 7600) vs 40 (Tesla T4) vs 320.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,581+63% | 10,153 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Turing |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2048 | 2560+25% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 21.75 TFLOPS+167% | 8.141 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2655 MHz+67% | 1590 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 128 | 160+25% |
| L1 Cache | 0.5 MB | 2.5 MB+400% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 32 | 40+25% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Tesla T4 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) vs 4 MB (Tesla T4) — the Tesla T4 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 12 Ultimate (Tesla T4). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600) vs NVENC (Turing) (Tesla T4). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Tesla T4).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7600 draws 165W versus the Tesla T4's 70W — a 80.9% difference. The Tesla T4 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (Radeon RX 7600) vs 500W (Tesla T4). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 240mm vs 168mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 76°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 165W | 70W-58% |
| Recommended PSU | 550W | 500W-9% |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 240mm | 168mm |
| Height | 111mm | 69mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-1% | 76°C |
| Perf/Watt | 100.5 | 145.0+44% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7600 launched at $269 MSRP, while the Tesla T4 launched at $1880. The Radeon RX 7600 costs 85.7% less ($1611 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 61.6 (Radeon RX 7600) vs 5.4 (Tesla T4) — the Radeon RX 7600 offers 1040.7% better value. The Radeon RX 7600 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7600 | Tesla T4 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $269-86% | $1880 |
| Performance per Dollar | 61.6+1041% | 5.4 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | TU104 |
| Release | May 24 2023 | September 13 2018 |
| Ranking | #118 | #260 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












