
Radeon RX 7800M vs Radeon Pro Vega II

Radeon RX 7800M
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega II
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon RX 7800M
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Pro Vega II
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon RX 7800M is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.5% higher G3D Mark score and 100+% more VRAM (12 GB vs 0 MB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Radeon Pro Vega II.
| Insight | Radeon RX 7800M | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.5%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.5%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (RDNA 3.0 / 5nm) | GCN 5.1 (7nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ FSR 3 / AFMF Support | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (12 GB) | ⚠️ Potential Buffer Bottleneck |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | Standard Size (267mm) |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon RX 7800M remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon RX 7800M and Radeon Pro Vega II

Radeon RX 7800M
The Radeon RX 7800M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,984 points.

Radeon Pro Vega II
The Radeon Pro Vega II is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1574 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,597 points. Launch price was $2,199.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon RX 7800M scores 15,984 and the Radeon Pro Vega II reaches 15,597 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon RX 7800M is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega II uses GCN 5.1, both on 5 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,840 (Radeon RX 7800M) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Raw compute: 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7800M) vs 14.09 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega II). Boost clocks: 2335 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7800M | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,984+2% | 15,597 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3840 | 4096+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 35.87 TFLOPS+155% | 14.09 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2335 MHz+36% | 1720 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 240 | 256+7% |
| L1 Cache | 0.75 MB | 1 MB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7800M is support for FSR 3 / AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro Vega II lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7800M | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 3 (Native) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | FSR 3 / AFMF (Driver) | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon RX 7800M comes with 12 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega II has 0 MB. The Radeon RX 7800M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 432 GB/s (Radeon RX 7800M) vs 864 GB/s (Radeon Pro Vega II) — a 100% advantage for the Radeon Pro Vega II. Bus width: 192-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7800M | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 12 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 432 GB/s | 864 GB/s+100% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 384-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon RX 7800M) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 6.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7800M | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 6+100% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7800M) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Decoder: VCN 4.0 vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7800M) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7800M | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 4.0 | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | VCN 4.0 | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon RX 7800M draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro Vega II's 475W — a 90.1% difference. The Radeon RX 7800M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon RX 7800M) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II). Power connectors: Mobile vs Integrated. Card length: 0mm vs 267mm, occupying 0 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon RX 7800M | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-62% | 475W |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | Mobile | Integrated |
| Length | 0mm | 267mm |
| Height | 0mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 0-100% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.8+171% | 32.8 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7800M is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon RX 7800M | Radeon Pro Vega II |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $2199 |
| Avg Price (30d) | — | $1800 |
| Codename | Navi 32 | Vega 20 |
| Release | September 11 2024 | June 3 2019 |
| Ranking | #131 | #138 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
















