Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
Tesla C2050
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H vs Tesla C2050 Performance Spectrum
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H vs Tesla C2050 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with Ryzen 7 9800X3D to isolate GPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H vs Tesla C2050: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each GPU makes more sense in practice: raw FPS, VRAM, features, power draw, pricing, and long-term headroom.
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,049 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 467.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.2 vs 1.3 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Better long-term bet: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm gives it a newer hardware base for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 43W instead of 238W, a 195W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Tesla C2050
2011Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌2011 hardware with 2 GB of VRAM is already well past its comfortable zone for modern gaming, so it is hard to recommend now.
- ❌455.3% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 1.3 vs 7.2 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌453.5% higher power demand at 238W vs 43W.
Quick Answers
Which GPU is faster for gaming right now?
Which GPU is the safer long-term pick for 2026 and beyond?
Which GPU is the better buy today?
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H vs Tesla C2050 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,245 points.
Tesla C2050
The Tesla C2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,176 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H scores 3,245 and the Tesla C2050 reaches 3,176 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Tesla C2050 uses Fermi, both on 6 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 448 (Tesla C2050). Raw compute: 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,245+2% | 3,176 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+300% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.49 TFLOPS+1504% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 112+100% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 896 KB+75% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards ship with 2 GB of video memory. Memory bus width is System on the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H and 64-bit on the Tesla C2050. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2050) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H draws 43W versus the Tesla C2050's 238W — a 138.8% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 350W (Tesla C2050). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-82% | 238W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 75.5+468% | 13.3 |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H came in at $450, while the Tesla C2050 launched at $2499. On MSRP, Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H was 82% cheaper ($2049 less). Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 7.2 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 1.3 (Tesla C2050) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H offers 453.8% better value. The newer card here is Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H (2025 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450-82% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2+454% | 1.3 |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GF100 |
| Release | August 8 2025 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #229 | #569 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H and Tesla C2050
