Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H vs Tesla C2050
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
Popular choices:
Tesla C2050
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
Performance Per Dollar Tesla C2050
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is significantly newer (2025 vs 2011). The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The Tesla C2050 lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score. This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the Tesla C2050.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%) |
| Longevity | RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) (6nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi (2010−2014)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+0%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
The Tesla C2050 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $95 versus $450 for the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H, it costs 79% less. While it maintains basic entry-level capabilities, this results in a 363.6% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+363.6%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($450) | ✅More affordable ($95) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H and Tesla C2050
Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 8 2025. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1452 MHz to 2300 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 43W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,245 points.
Tesla C2050
The Tesla C2050 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in July 25 2011. It features the Fermi architecture. The core clock speed is 574 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 238W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 3,176 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H scores 3,245 and the Tesla C2050 reaches 3,176 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is built on RDNA 3.0 while the Tesla C2050 uses Fermi, both on 6 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 1,792 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 448 (Tesla C2050). Raw compute: 16.49 TFLOPS (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 1.028 TFLOPS (Tesla C2050).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 3,245+2% | 3,176 |
| Architecture | RDNA 3.0 | Fermi |
| Process Node | 6 nm | 40 nm |
| Shading Units | 1792+300% | 448 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 16.49 TFLOPS+1504% | 1.028 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 112+100% | 56 |
| L1 Cache | 512 KB | 896 KB+75% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 2 GB of video memory. Bus width: System vs 64-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 0.75 MB (Tesla C2050) — the Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 2 GB | 2 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | System | 64-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB+167% | 0.75 MB |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H draws 43W versus the Tesla C2050's 238W — a 138.8% difference. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 350W (Tesla C2050). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered.
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 43W-82% | 238W |
| Recommended PSU | 350W | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Perf/Watt | 75.5+468% | 13.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H launched at $450 MSRP and currently averages $450, while the Tesla C2050 launched at $2499 and now averages $95. The Tesla C2050 costs 78.9% less ($355 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 7.2 (Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H) vs 33.4 (Tesla C2050) — the Tesla C2050 offers 363.9% better value. The Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2011).
| Feature | Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H | Tesla C2050 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $450-82% | $2499 |
| Avg Price (30d) | $450 | $95-79% |
| Performance per Dollar | 7.2 | 33.4+364% |
| Codename | Navi 33 | GF100 |
| Release | August 8 2025 | July 25 2011 |
| Ranking | #229 | #569 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar GPU comparisons based on Radeon Ryzen 7 4800H and Tesla C2050
