Radeon TM R9 A360 vs GeForce GTX 460 v2

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Value Upgrade Path

This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.

MSRP is the manufacturer's suggested retail price.•
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Per Dollar

Based on actual market prices and performance benchmarks.

Performance Comparison

About G3D Mark

🏆 Chipversus Verdict

🚀 Performance Leadership

The Radeon TM R9 A360 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 2.2% higher G3D Mark score and 100% more VRAM (2 GB vs 1 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce GTX 460 v2.

Insight	Radeon TM R9 A360	GeForce GTX 460 v2
Performance	✅Leading raw performance (+2.2%)	❌Lower raw frame rates (-2.2%)
Longevity	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2015 / GCN 1.0 (2012−2020))	🛑Obsolete Architecture (2011 / Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014))
Ecosystem	Supports FSR Upscaling	Supports FSR Upscaling
VRAM	✅ More VRAM (+100%)	❌ Less VRAM capacity
Efficiency	💡 Excellent Perf/Watt	⚡ Higher Power Consumption
Case Fit	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly	📏 Compact / SFF Friendly

💎 Value Proposition

The Radeon TM R9 A360 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. While both GPUs are considered legacy components by modern standards, the Radeon TM R9 A360 holds the technical lead. Priced at $20 (vs $50), it costs 60% less, resulting in a 155.5% higher cost efficiency score.

Insight	Radeon TM R9 A360	GeForce GTX 460 v2
Cost Efficiency	✅Better overall value (+155.5%)	❌Lower cost efficiency
Upfront Cost	✅More affordable ($20)	⚠️Higher upfront cost ($50)

Performance Check

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon TM R9 A360 Benchmark Check

GeForce GTX 460 v2 Benchmark Check

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon TM R9 A360 and GeForce GTX 460 v2

Radeon TM R9 A360

The Radeon TM R9 A360 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 5 2015. It features the GCN 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 900 MHz to 925 MHz. It has 512 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 30W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,060 points.

GeForce GTX 460 v2

The GeForce GTX 460 v2 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 24 2011. It features the Fermi 2.0 architecture. The core clock speed is 779 MHz. It has 336 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 40 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 2,016 points. Launch price was $199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon TM R9 A360 scores 2,060 and the GeForce GTX 460 v2 reaches 2,016 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon TM R9 A360 is built on GCN 1.0 while the GeForce GTX 460 v2 uses Fermi 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 40 nm. Shader units: 512 (Radeon TM R9 A360) vs 336 (GeForce GTX 460 v2). Raw compute: 0.9472 TFLOPS (Radeon TM R9 A360) vs 1.046 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 460 v2).

Feature	Radeon TM R9 A360	GeForce GTX 460 v2
G3D Mark Score	2,060+2%	2,016
Architecture	GCN 1.0	Fermi 2.0
Process Node	28 nm	40 nm
Shading Units	512+52%	336
Compute (TFLOPS)	0.9472 TFLOPS	1.046 TFLOPS+10%
ROPs	16	24+50%
TMUs	32	56+75%
L1 Cache	128 KB	448 KB+250%
L2 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon TM R9 A360	GeForce GTX 460 v2
Upscaling Tech	FSR 1.0 (Software)	FSR 2.1 (Compatible)
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR 3 (Compatible)
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	Standard

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon TM R9 A360 comes with 2 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 460 v2 has 1 GB. The Radeon TM R9 A360 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 64-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 256 KB (Radeon TM R9 A360) vs 384 KB (GeForce GTX 460 v2) — the GeForce GTX 460 v2 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon TM R9 A360	GeForce GTX 460 v2
VRAM Capacity	2 GB+100%	1 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR5
Bus Width	64-bit	128-bit+100%
L2 Cache	256 KB	384 KB+50%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12_0 (Radeon TM R9 A360) vs 12 (FL 11_0) (GeForce GTX 460 v2). Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 2.

Feature	Radeon TM R9 A360	GeForce GTX 460 v2
DirectX	12_0	12 (FL 11_0)
Max Displays	0	2

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCE 2.0 (Radeon TM R9 A360) vs Legacy (GeForce GTX 460 v2). Decoder: UVD 4.2 vs PureVideo VP4.

Feature	Radeon TM R9 A360	GeForce GTX 460 v2
Encoder	VCE 2.0	Legacy
Decoder	UVD 4.2	PureVideo VP4
Codecs	—	H.264,VC-1,MPEG-2,MPEG-4 ASP

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon TM R9 A360 draws 30W versus the GeForce GTX 460 v2's 160W — a 136.8% difference. The Radeon TM R9 A360 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 350W (Radeon TM R9 A360) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 460 v2). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 6-pin. Card length: 1mm vs 210mm, occupying 0 vs 2 slots.

Feature	Radeon TM R9 A360	GeForce GTX 460 v2
TDP	30W-81%	160W
Recommended PSU	350W-22%	450W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 6-pin
Length	1mm	210mm
Height	—	111mm
Slots	0-100%	2
Perf/Watt	68.7+445%	12.6

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon TM R9 A360 launched at $0 MSRP and currently averages $20, while the GeForce GTX 460 v2 launched at $199 and now averages $50. The Radeon TM R9 A360 costs 60% less ($30 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 103.0 (Radeon TM R9 A360) vs 40.3 (GeForce GTX 460 v2) — the Radeon TM R9 A360 offers 155.6% better value. The Radeon TM R9 A360 is the newer GPU (2015 vs 2011).