
Radeon Vega 2 vs GeForce GT 425M

Radeon Vega 2
Popular choices:

GeForce GT 425M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Per Dollar GeForce GT 425M
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
⚠️ Generational Difference
The Radeon Vega 2 is significantly newer (2021 vs 2013). The Radeon Vega 2 likely supports modern features like Ray Tracing, Tensor Cores, and DLSS/FSR upscaling, which act as force multipliers for performance. The GeForce GT 425M lacks this hardware feature set, limiting its longevity in modern titles despite any raw power similarities.
🚀 Performance Leadership
The Radeon Vega 2 is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 1.4% higher G3D Mark score. However, the GeForce GT 425M offers more VRAM, which may be beneficial for texture-heavy scenarios at higher resolutions.
| Insight | Radeon Vega 2 | GeForce GT 425M |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+1.4%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-1.4%) |
| Longevity | GCN 5.1 (2018−2022) (7nm) | 🛑Obsolete Architecture (2013 / Kepler (2012−2018)) |
| Ecosystem | Supports FSR Upscaling | Supports FSR Upscaling |
| VRAM | ❌ Less VRAM capacity | ✅ More VRAM (+100+%) |
| Efficiency | 💡 Excellent Perf/Watt | ⚡ Higher Power Consumption |
| Case Fit | — | — |
💎 Value Proposition
While current pricing data is unavailable, the Radeon Vega 2 remains the clear technical winner. Check real-time availability to determine if the performance gap justifies the market price.
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Vega 2 and GeForce GT 425M

Radeon Vega 2
The Radeon Vega 2 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in April 13 2021. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 300 MHz to 1900 MHz. It has 448 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 15W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 506 points.

GeForce GT 425M
The GeForce GT 425M is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 1 2013. It features the Kepler architecture. The core clock speed is 549 MHz. It has 384 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 45W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 499 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Vega 2 scores 506 and the GeForce GT 425M reaches 499 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Vega 2 is built on GCN 5.1 while the GeForce GT 425M uses Kepler, both on 7 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 448 (Radeon Vega 2) vs 384 (GeForce GT 425M). Raw compute: 1.702 TFLOPS (Radeon Vega 2) vs 0.4216 TFLOPS (GeForce GT 425M).
| Feature | Radeon Vega 2 | GeForce GT 425M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 506+1% | 499 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.1 | Kepler |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 448+17% | 384 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 1.702 TFLOPS+304% | 0.4216 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | 8 | 16+100% |
| TMUs | 28 | 32+14% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Vega 2 | GeForce GT 425M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | FSR 1.0 (Software) |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Vega 2 comes with 0 MB of VRAM, while the GeForce GT 425M has 1 GB. The GeForce GT 425M offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: System vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 2 | GeForce GT 425M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | Shared System RAM | 1 GB |
| Memory Type | Shared | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | System | Unknown |
| Bus Width | System | 128-bit |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (Radeon Vega 2) vs 11.0 (GeForce GT 425M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs None. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.0. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 2 | GeForce GT 425M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1)+9% | 11.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | None |
| OpenGL | 4.6+15% | 4.0 |
| Max Displays | 3+200% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 1.0 (Radeon Vega 2) vs No (GeForce GT 425M). Decoder: VCN 1.0 vs PureVideo HD VP4. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Vega 2) vs MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP (GeForce GT 425M).
| Feature | Radeon Vega 2 | GeForce GT 425M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 1.0 | No |
| Decoder | VCN 1.0 | PureVideo HD VP4 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,VC-1,MPEG-4 ASP |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Vega 2 draws 15W versus the GeForce GT 425M's 45W — a 100% difference. The Radeon Vega 2 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 0W (Radeon Vega 2) vs 350W (GeForce GT 425M). Power connectors: None vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 0mm vs 0mm, occupying 0 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 70 vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Vega 2 | GeForce GT 425M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 15W-67% | 45W |
| Recommended PSU | 0W-100% | 350W |
| Power Connector | None | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 0mm | 0mm |
| Height | 0mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 0 | 0 |
| Temp (Load) | 70-7% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 33.7+204% | 11.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Vega 2 costs 100+% less ($25 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): Infinity (Radeon Vega 2) vs 20.0 (GeForce GT 425M) — the Radeon Vega 2 offers Infinity% better value. The Radeon Vega 2 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2013).
| Feature | Radeon Vega 2 | GeForce GT 425M |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $0 | — |
| Avg Price (30d) | $0-100% | $25 |
| Performance per Dollar | Infinity | 20.0 |
| Codename | Cezanne | GK107 |
| Release | April 13 2021 | April 1 2013 |
| Ranking | #601 | #857 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.















