
RTX 6000 Ada Generation vs GeForce RTX 2060

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Value Upgrade Path
This is the official ChipVERSUS Value Rating, comparing raw performance (G3D Mark) per dollar. Components placed above yours deliver better value for money.
Avg price is the current average price collected from markets across the web.
Performance Per Dollar RTX 6000 Ada Generation
Performance Per Dollar
Performance Comparison
About G3D Mark🏆 Chipversus Verdict
🚀 Performance Leadership
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the superior choice for raw performance. It leads with a 101.6% higher G3D Mark score and 700% more VRAM (48 GB vs 6 GB). This advantage makes it significantly better for higher resolutions (1440p/4K) and graphic-intensive titles compared to the GeForce RTX 2060.
| Insight | RTX 6000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Performance | ✅Leading raw performance (+101.6%) | ❌Lower raw frame rates (-101.6%) |
| Longevity | 🏆Elite Architecture (Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) / 5nm) | Turing (2018−2022) (12nm) |
| Ecosystem | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling | ✨ DLSS 2 Upscaling |
| VRAM | 🎮 High Capacity (48 GB) | 🎮 High Capacity (6 GB) |
| Efficiency | Normal Efficiency | Normal Efficiency |
| Case Fit | Standard Size (267mm) | 📏 Compact / SFF Friendly |
💎 Value Proposition
The GeForce RTX 2060 offers a compelling cost-to-performance ratio. Priced at $120 versus $5,500 for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation, it costs 98% less. While it maintains significantly lower raw performance, this results in a 2173.5% higher cost efficiency score.
| Insight | RTX 6000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Cost Efficiency | ❌Lower cost efficiency | ✅Better overall value (+2173.5%) |
| Upfront Cost | ⚠️Higher upfront cost ($5,500) | ✅More affordable ($120) |
Performance Check
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 7800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of RTX 6000 Ada Generation and GeForce RTX 2060

RTX 6000 Ada Generation
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 3 2022. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 915 MHz to 2505 MHz. It has 18176 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 142 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 28,454 points. Launch price was $6,799.

GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the RTX 6000 Ada Generation scores 28,454 versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 14,114 — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation leads by 101.6%. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is built on Ada Lovelace while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 5 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 18,176 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 91.06 TFLOPS (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 2505 MHz vs 1680 MHz. Ray tracing: 142 RT cores (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 30 (GeForce RTX 2060) with 568 Tensor cores vs 240.
| Feature | RTX 6000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 28,454+102% | 14,114 |
| Architecture | Ada Lovelace | Turing |
| Process Node | 5 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 18176+847% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 91.06 TFLOPS+1312% | 6.451 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 2505 MHz+49% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 192+300% | 48 |
| TMUs | 568+373% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 17.8 MB+837% | 1.9 MB |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+3100% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 142+373% | 30 |
| Tensor Cores | 568+137% | 240 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | RTX 6000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR 1.0 (Software) | DLSS 2.0 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR 3 / AFMF (Compatible) |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation comes with 48 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation offers 700% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 960 GB/s (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 185.7% advantage for the RTX 6000 Ada Generation. Bus width: 384-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 96 MB (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the RTX 6000 Ada Generation has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | RTX 6000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 48 GB+700% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 960 GB/s+186% | 336 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+100% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 96 MB+3100% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | RTX 6000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | RTX 6000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 8th Gen | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | AV1,HEVC,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation draws 300W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: 16-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 72.
| Feature | RTX 6000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 160W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 16-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 112mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 72-10% |
| Perf/Watt | 94.8+7% | 88.2 |
Value Analysis
The RTX 6000 Ada Generation launched at $6799 MSRP and currently averages $5500, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 and now averages $120. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 97.8% less ($5380 savings) at current market prices. Performance per dollar (G3D Mark / price): 5.2 (RTX 6000 Ada Generation) vs 117.6 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 2161.5% better value. The RTX 6000 Ada Generation is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | RTX 6000 Ada Generation | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $6799 | $349-95% |
| Avg Price (30d) | $5500 | $120-98% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.2 | 117.6+2162% |
| Codename | AD102 | TU106 |
| Release | December 3 2022 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #24 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.














